PDA

View Full Version : Israeli Concerns About UNIFIL


maven
06-01-2009, 01:42 PM
Israel is becoming increasingly anxious about the fate of UNIFIL if Hizbullah increases its power in upcoming parliamentary elections in Lebanon.

Defense officials have also expressed concern with American plans to supply advanced military platforms to the Lebanese armed forces.

The Lebanese people will head to polls on June 7 amid predictions that Hizbullah will bolster its position in parliament and form the next coalition.

Israel is concerned that if Hizbullah wins the elections, some European members of UNIFIL will consider downsizing their participation in the force or completely withdrawing their personnel. Poland has already decided to withdraw its forces and transfer them to Afghanistan.

"We are hoping to receive assurances that European countries will remain committed to UNIFIL even in the event of a Hizbullah victory in the elections," a senior defense official familiar with the issue said.

On Tuesday, IDF Chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi told the Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee that while Hizbullah was amassing unprecedented amounts of weaponry, UNIFIL's presence in southern Lebanon was "making the task more difficult."

Senior defense officials said they were concerned with the supply of American arms platforms to Lebanon and warned that if Hizbullah formed the next government, the weapons would fall into the guerrilla group's hands.

Lebanese Defense Minister Elias Murr was quoted as saying last week that the US has promised to supply dozens of fighter jets, helicopters, tanks and unmanned aerial vehicles following the elections and regardless of its results.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak warned this week that if Hizbullah gained considerably in the elections Israel would not feel the restraints it did in 2006 about attacking Lebanese infrastructure.

"Today Hizbullah controls a third of the Lebanese government," Barak said. "If in the upcoming elections Hizbullah will gain more power in the government, that will open it up more than in the past to the IDF's force, and will give us a freedom of action that we did not have completely in July 2006."

During the early days of the Second Lebanon War in 2006, there was a debate inside the government about the degree to which the IDF should hit essential infrastructure in Lebanon, with much of the world urging Israeli restraint so as not to weaken the position of pro-Western Lebanese Prime Minister Fuad Saniora.

"The UN investigation will apparently find Hizbullah responsible for the killing of [former Lebanese prime minister Rafik] Hariri," Barak said, adding that this is a further indictment against Hizbullah for trying to undermine the legitimacy of moderate regimes in the region.

MORE:

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1243346492360

Rob
06-01-2009, 02:08 PM
Where are those international law activists to point out that Hezballah is violating UN resolution after UN resolution?

Or are they just a bunch of hypocrites of the worst kind?

Mediocrates
06-01-2009, 07:22 PM
UNIFIL should leave; they do nothing. Lebanon is finished. In a few short years it will look like Somalia. The modern weapons Obama will give them will have to be used quickly because not even Obama will sell Hezbollah spare parts after they use their goods to murder Israelis in Israel. Lebzolla will have to get their gear for free from Iran which means wholesale scrapping of the gear they'll have at the time. In either case Lebanon is over and out, it's a country that's walking dead.

Reffo
06-02-2009, 12:00 AM
Where are those international law activists to point out that Hezballah is violating UN resolution after UN resolution?

Or are they just a bunch of hypocrites of the worst kind? Is the Pope Catholic? Of course they [the international law activists] are hypocrites, what else is new ...?

Yala
06-02-2009, 12:26 AM
Lebanon is absolutely finished. All countries (Western & Middle Eastern) have given up the country to Iran.

maven
06-02-2009, 07:24 AM
It seems to me to be totally ridiculous for the US to promise to supply a Hiz'bollah led Lebanon with advanced weapons.

Lebanon can actually use them you know even if it only until they run out of spares which could be a while, and I don't think the US is saying you can have the weapons but no spares.

This policy is as bad as the last administration urging the Gazans to have a democratic election!

Mediocrates
06-02-2009, 09:02 AM
Well that's the great deal with direct aid, you don't have to enter into contracts. If we give them some fighter planes, some artillery, some missiles, there's nothing carved in stone to say we have to replenish them.

maven
06-02-2009, 09:25 AM
Well that's the great deal with direct aid, you don't have to enter into contracts. If we give them some fighter planes, some artillery, some missiles, there's nothing carved in stone to say we have to replenish them.Nor that they will use them against Israel.

Mediocrates
06-02-2009, 10:14 AM
Well in either case after the elections they will kick out UNIFIL so it's a moot point for them.