PDA

View Full Version : U.S. threatened sanctions if Israel blocked 'Roadmap'



yoyo
05-28-2003, 03:53 AM
I have trouble believing it but IMRA ( http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3?id=17000 )
and Wold Tribune ( http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/front_1.html ) both seems to say the same thing. What is going on???

----


SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM
Wednesday, May 28, 2003
The Bush administration has prepared a list of sanctions against Israel should it refuse to comply with a plan for a Palestinian state by the end of the year.

U.S. government and congressional sources said the list was prepared by the State Department and relayed to the National Security Council in April amid the administration's effort to press Israel to agree to the so-called roadmap. The roadmap, drafted by Washington as well as the European Union, United Nations and Russia, calls for an end to the Israeli-Palestinian war and the establishment of an interim state in 2003.

The sources said the State Department's proposed list of sanctions included an examination of the use of U.S. weapons in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Israel has employed such platforms as the AH-64A Apache helicopter, the AH-1G Cobra helicopter and the F-16 fighter-jet in air attacks on Palestinian insurgents, Middle East Newsline reported.
"It's hard to overestimate the anger within the administration toward Israel regarding the delays in the roadmap," a congressional source close to the administration said. "The White House doesn't regard the roadmap merely as foreign policy. It sees the roadmap as a major element toward the reelection of the president."

So far, the State Department has rebuffed efforts by pro-Arab lobbyists in Congress for the review. Officials said that so far they have not received evidence that U.S. weapons specifically targeted Palestinian civilians.

The threat of U.S. sanctions against Israel was relayed to a senior Israeli official, Dov Weissglass, through who the sources termed were individuals close to the White House. Over the last two months, Weissglass, an envoy of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, held several meetings in Washington with senior administration officials in an effort to revise the roadmap. The sources said Weissglass understood that the sanctions threat stemmed from White House officials and relayed the information to Sharon.

The sources said the Israeli acceptance of the roadmap has suspended any action on the list of proposed sanctions. But they did not rule out that the administration would reconsider should Israel fail to implement the roadmap over the next few months.

The State Department threat to examine the Israeli use of U.S. weaponry could suspend arms shipment to the Jewish state. Israel has ordered the AH-64D Apache Longbow helicopter and expects the first F-16I fighter-jets to arrive later this year.

Other proposed measures against Israel drafted by the State Department included the suspension of $9 billion in U.S. emergency aid. The aid comprises $8 billion in loan guarantees and $1 billion in a military grant.

The sources said the money would have been held up on grounds that Israel has not implemented economic reform demanded by the United States.

The sources said Bush has pledged to Arab allies that he will continue to remain involved in the implementation of the roadmap. They said Bush has also pledged that a Palestinian state will emerge by the end of the year.

"The president's involvement is the biggest deal," Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Richard Lugar, regarded as Bush's closest ally in Congress, said.

ibrodsky
05-28-2003, 06:53 AM
The administration is clearly trying to appear "balanced" in its approach to the Israeli-Arab conflict.

However, there are several points to consider:

* This administration doesn't believe that all diplomacy must be conducted out in the open. The flipside is that some things may be said simply to provide cover for specific actions.

* The Arabs and their supporters claim they merely want a Palestinian state and accept Israel's right to exist. It's time to call their bluff.

* It hardly makes sense that the "road map" is necessary for reelection when the American public is overwhelmingly more sympathetic to Israel than the Palestinians.

While I accept that some things must be done for political purposes, I do think the administration is committing a couple of serious errors.

* It sends the wrong message for the US to use assassinations, overwhelming military force, and so forth to fight terrorism while demanding that Israel "show restraint."

* To some extent, the US has surrendered to the Arab Big Lie. In order to prove the US is not blindly pro-Israel, the US lends a degree of credibility to the Arab policy of isolating and ganging up on Israel. There was no reason to exclude Israel from the coalition fighting Iraq other than fear of offending the Arab and Islamist sensibilities that fuel terrorism, jihad, and the most vile racism.

But at the end of the day, we brought down Saddam and are pressuring both Syria and Iran. This hardly works against Israel's interests.

Personally, I think a Palestinian state at peace with Israel will have to be forced on the Arabs--not Israel. The assumption is that giving the Palestinians a state will allow them to build an army and step up terrorism. The Lebanese have a state and an army--what good does it do them?

Arguably, a Palestinian state will have fewer excuses for harboring or even just tolerating the terrorists in its midst. A "temporary Palestinian state" sounds crazy, but it could be an excellent opportunity to force the Palestinians to suppress Hamas et al without really giving them anything that can't be taken back if necessary.