PDA

View Full Version : Karl Rove decided: Israel's red lines ignored, PA state without eliminating terror


humus_sapiens
06-08-2003, 11:46 PM
Karl Rove decided for Bush: Israel's red lines ignored, PA state without eliminating terror

Middle East Newsline - Jun 04, 2003
State Department Wins Against National Security Council in Road Map Responsibility [With thanks to www.mideastweb.org/mewnews1.htm ]

WASHINGTON [MENL] President George Bush has resolved a dispute within his administration over U.S. strategy to establish a Palestinian state.

Administration officials and senior sources in Congress said Bush resolved several issues that concerned U.S. policy to establish an interim Palestinian state by the end of 2003. The officials said the decisions concerned policy issues as well as appointments to oversee the so-called roadmap. The roadmap, drafted by Washington, the European Union, United Nations and Russia, also envisions a Palestinian state with permanent borders in 2005.

"There were some heated discussions within the top echelon of the administration over the principles that would guide the roadmap," an official said. "The debates were both between and within agencies and the president resolved them on the eve of his arrival in Sharm [e-Sheik] to meet with Arab leaders."

Most of the issues, the officials and congressional sources said, were submitted to Bush's chief political strategist Karl Rove. They said Rove, who engineered the Republican victory in Congress in November 2002, has been granted major input in U.S. foreign policy as part of an effort to prepare Bush's reelection campaign in 2004. Rove accompanied the president during the Sharm e-Sheik and Aqaba summits.

The administration officials and congressional sources said a key debate was whether to link the establishment of an interim Palestinian state to the elimination of Palestinian insurgency groups by the Palestinian Authority as well as an Arab commitment to stop funding such groups as Hamas and Islamic Jihad. They said officials in the Defense Department and National Security Council said such a condition was vital to ensure that a Palestinian state would not endanger U.S. and Israeli interests in the region.

As late as Saturday, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz asserted that Bush had maintained the linkage between a Palestinian state and an end to insurgency groups. Wolfowitz said the issue was a key element in Bush's pledge in June 2002 for the establishment of a democratic and peaceful Palestine.

"As President Bush said last June, the United States supports the
establishment of a Palestinian state if Palestinians, in turn, embrace democracy, confront corruption and reject terror,"
Wolfowitz, addressing a security conference in Singapore, said. "The roadmap lays the foundation for this state. It also lays down markers for what Palestinians and Israelis must accomplish."

But officials said Bush decided not to impose conditions for the
establishment of an interim state. They said that instead Bush expressed his determination to achieve a Palestinian ceasefire as well as an Israeli withdrawal from parts of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Another issue that at one point divided the administration was whether Bush should press Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz to stop all Saudi funding to Hamas. Several officials had argued that a halt in Saudi funding to Hamas would help the new Palestinian prime minister, Mahmoud Abbas, who has pledged to end Palestinian attacks against Israel.

The State Department rejected the proposal, officials said. They said Assistant Secretary of State William Burns argued that Riyad has taken significant steps to stop the funding of groups deemed as terrorists and has allowed a U.S. interagency team to monitor the investigation of the May 12 suicide strikes in Riyad.

Burns and other officials warned that raising the Hamas issue with Abdullah could endanger other U.S.-Saudi cooperation against Al Qaida. In the end, Bush decided not to press the Hamas issue with Abdullah during their meeting on Tuesday, officials said.

"The Saudis told the president that they are making renewed efforts on the fight against terrorism, including particularly on the financing of terrorism," U.S. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice told a briefing in Sharm e-Sheik on Tuesday.

The administration also argued over the content of the communiques for the summits in Sharm e-Sheik and Aqaba. Officials said Pentagon and National Security Council aides wanted the communiques to include the U.S. commitment to the continuation of a Jewish state. They said the proponents, including several leading House and Senate members, argued that this would reassure Israel that Washington would reject a Palestinian demand for the return of millions of refugees and their descendants to their homes in Israel.

Bush, however, decided in favor of a recommendation by Secretary of State Colin Powell not to include any mention of a Jewish state in the summit communiques. Instead, Powell told a news conference in Sharm that the United States envisions Israel as a Jewish state alongside a "contiguous" Palestinian state.

"Israel, to live side by side in peace with Palestine, must be always seen as a Jewish state," Powell said. "That has implications, as we go forward, as to how we will negotiate some of the difficult issues that remain in front of us."

Officials said the most heated dispute concerned the appointment of a presidential envoy to monitor the roadmap. Ms. Rice urged the president to appoint outgoing U.S. ambassador to India, Robert Blackwill, as the U.S. monitor of Israeli and Palestinian commitments to the roadmap. Blackwill is regarded as a personal friend of Bush.

But Powell was said to have opposed Blackwill's appointment. Blackwill often clashed with Assistant Secretary of State Christina Rocca in the ambassador's support for Indian-U.S. defense relations and the inclusion of Israel in a strategic alliance with Washington and New Dehli.

Finally, Bush agreed not to appoint Blackwill and asked Powell for his recommendation. Officials said Powell recommended Assistant Secretary of State John Wolf, responsible for State Department policy on nonproliferation. Wolf served in the State Department's Bureau of Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs under the administration of President Ronald Reagan in 1987 and 1988.

"The struggle was basically over whether the National Security Council or the State Department would be responsible for the roadmap issue," an official said. "State won and it will largely
determine the tactics and pace of the process."

humus_sapiens
06-10-2003, 12:12 AM
More details of the shameful story. Hope it won't turn into history...

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/article.php3?id=2375

Powell is Not an Anti-Semite (by Ya'akov-Perez Golbert)

...
Powell blurted out the US view of the true basis of US-Israel relations and the “Road Map” as early as August 2, 2001, with his denunciation of Israel’s targeting of Hamas terrorist commanders. Powell explained that for Israel to inflict casualties on the Palestinians makes America’s relations with the Arab countries more difficult. In effect, he is saying, “Hey, guys! Don´t fight back! You´re embarrassing us in front of the Arabs.”

The Road Map is just the institutionalization of that relationship. Israel is obligated to redeem America’s relations with Israel’s enemies, after the US-led invasion of Iraq, even to the extent of taking casualties without fighting back, allowing the establishment of a terrorist state in its heartland, financing it and giving blessing to CIA training and arming of its "security" infrastructure. It is not acceptable for Jews to fight back. We are now obliged by the Road Map to run to a powerful non-Jewish protector to defend us. To ensure that our protector will, in fact, protect us in the hour of need, we have to constantly suck up to our protector and make sure that we are so useful and so valuable to him that he will reckon it in his interest to do so.

What if our enemies are more useful and more valuable to our protectors than we? What if President Bush has finally grasped the fact that the Jews don’t have any oil and the Arabs do? And that, contrary to what the whole world believes, the Arabs also have a lot more money. Nor is that all. In the memorable words of Billy Carter, “There´s a lot more Arabs than there is Jews.” And that will be true within the US, as well, just as it is true today in countries of Western Europe. What if Bush, our protector, has grasped all that? Well, then we Jews are supposed to wring our hands and cry “Oy veh!” and die, of course. But on no account are we to fight back. That is anathema to Moslems. In Islamic law, it is forbidden for a Jew (or a Christian, by the way) to strike a Moslem for any reason whatsoever. The Christians might as well have such a law, because it is similarly utterly repugnant and unacceptable to the Christian world for Jews to inflict casualties on non-Jews in order to defend themselves.

So, when rioters attacked Israeli military positions with stones and fire bombs, and with gunmen among the rioters with AK-47 assault rifles, the world was outraged when Israel fired on them. That’s “excessive force”. But United Nations “peacekeepers” in Sierra Leone fired on rioters throwing stones, absent the gunmen with sub-machine guns. So did police in Goteborg, Genoa and Cincinnati, likewise in the absence of gunmen. No one condemned them for “excessive force”, because they have the right of self-defense. They aren’t Jews.

Once again, Sharon eased the closure on the PLO-controlled territories in order to prove Israel’s peaceful intentions and, once again, it took only hours for the Arabs to use their new-found freedom to murder Jews. Once again, we are told that the “militants” who perpetrated the murders are “killing peace” and the “hopes of the Palestinians” and the “future of the peoples of the region”. They are killing everything, except Jews. When Israel reimposes the closure, after the requisite sacrifice of Jewish blood, the world will deplore the closure for causing hardship to Palestinian civilians. Jews are not permitted even to inconvenience non-Jews in self-defense.

Ariel Sharon, the Warrior, and his government, have fully accepted that. The Road Map obliges Israel to refrain from targeting the terrorists who plan and execute the murder of Jews, to refrain from re-entering “Palestinian” cities, no matter what. The Road Map permits the CIA to unify, train and equip “Palestinian” security, in order to enable it to crack down on terrorist groups and unauthorized weapons, which the new, “moderate” prime minister, in Arabic broadcasts, affirms he will not do.

No one seems to have picked up on it. Not even the Jewish papers or the Israeli media. Did no one notice? Or would it just not be smart to say such a thing where your protector can hear? “Shah! Shtill! [Shh! Be quiet!] You’ll get us in trouble.”

humus_sapiens
06-10-2003, 01:35 AM
I don't believe Bush or Powell are Anti-Semites. But it doesn't matter what drives them to go against self-declared "war on international terrorism" and side with Israel's sworn enemies. Oil, money, or ambitions for Peace Nobel? All smell bad, and it will not be forgotten nor forgiven.

Revkha
06-10-2003, 04:16 PM
Originally posted by humus_sapiens
I don't believe Bush or Powell are Anti-Semites. But it doesn't matter what drives them to go against self-declared "war on international terrorism" and side with Israel's sworn enemies. Oil, money, or ambitions for Peace Nobel? All smell bad, and it will not be forgotten nor forgiven.

When will we learn that Jewish blood is cheap and expendable in the eyes of the world. And to think that Bush signed the visitor's book at Auschwitz with the words "Never Again."

Adversary2Arabs
06-12-2003, 06:39 PM
Originally posted by Revkha
When will we learn that Jewish blood is cheap and expendable in the eyes of the world. And to think that Bush signed the visitor's book at Auschwitz with the words "Never Again."

He signed that? What a worthless human he really is. Never Again [unless it's in Israel]. He forgot that second half.