PDA

View Full Version : Refugee camps or UN Viper nests


Flame
03-20-2002, 07:34 PM
Israel Resource Review
14th March, 2002

Has UNRWA allowed their Refugee Camps to Become the Host of Terror Activity?
David Bedein


Israel Minister of Defence and newly-elected Labor Party leader
Binyamin Ben Eliezer has been declaring that the Arab refugee
camps represent a haven for killers, and a threat to the
security of all Israeli citizens.


Not a day goes by that we do not hear about these refugee camps:

suicide bombers who come from refugee camps;
killers who take asylum in refugee camps;
mortars that are fired from refugee camps;
food warehouses in refugee camps which have been transformed into
storage bins for artillery shells, ammunition and mortar rounds;
Al Quaeda squads which are based in refugee camps;
refugee camps which organize official celebrations in honor of their
recently-martyred suicide bombers.

Who runs these "refugee camps"? There is one agency with absolute authority
over Palestinian refugee camps - and it is not the PLO, not the P.A., not Hamas,
Islamic Jihad or any other Arab entity.

The agency which runs these refugee camps in none other than UNRWA, the
United Nations Relief and Works Agency! This body was established by the UN
after the 1948 War of Liberation, with a mandate to administer 'temporary
shelters' until such time as the refugees earned/won/were granted the right to
return to the homes and villages they had fled in '48 - even if these villages no
longer existed!

UNRWA, therefore, remains the only refugee agency in the world whose apparent
purpose is to perpetuate the status of refugees as refugees! Indeed, the official
curriculum of the free UNRWA education system is based on that idea - that
refugees must remain refugees until such time as they are repatriated to their
homes.

Peter Hanson, the Danish-born Director of UNRWA, explains that "the right of
return" remains the motto of UNRWA, and the cause which unites all of the
Palestinian people.

Sammy Messhassha, Head of Public Affairs for UNRWA in
Jerusalem,acknowledges that UNRWA is well aware of the fact that thousands of
armed Palestinian Authority security personnel make their homes in UNRWA
camps, and that UNRWA does not object to such a phenomenon.

P.A. media analyst Ghassan Khatib remarked to CNN, in a February/2000
interview, that every young man in the UNRWA Balata refugee camp now has his
own personal weapon! How? Each UNRWA camp hosts a local steering committee
which is in charge of distributing the funds received as charitable donations
from relief organizations and donor countries around the world. And it is that
committee which decides whether to provide food rations or weapons with the
money at their disposal.

In light of such evidence, will the nations and organizations which contribute so
generously to UNRWA - including the United States, Canada, E.U., and even Israel
-now demand that UNRWA disarm these hotbeds of terrorism masquerading as
refugee camps? Or not.

At this time, as UNRWA food storage bins are turned into ammunition dumps to
supply armed weapons to the Palestinian gunmen, UNRWA issues urgent memos
for donor nations to urgently allocate funds to UNRWA.

There is one question for the UNRWA donor nations to ask: Where has all the
flour gone??

NewsGuy
03-20-2002, 08:09 PM
Excellent post!

Add this to the list of outrageous facts covered-up by the media.

L@mplighterM
03-20-2002, 09:04 PM
There is one question for the UNRWA donor nations to ask: Where has all the flour gone

weapons and ammunition!

Flame
03-20-2002, 09:24 PM
After 50 years to continue calling them refugee camps seems a little outdated... when by todays standards, they are basically the same as The Projects we have in this country. Yes, lots of regular people continue to live in what has become ghettos, as well as major gang activity.. except the Projects in Israel, are by far more lethal than the American versions, which are not funded by the UN.

I realize that sounds heartless... but how long does a person remain with refugee status? Globally, people relocate within months. It's not like plenty of countries wouldn't help these people financially, to get on their feet.

Imagine if the people in America's projects tried what "palestinians" do on a daily basis? Wonder how long it would take to put an end to violence? 50 years?

L@mplighterM
03-20-2002, 09:53 PM
Imagine if the people in America's projects tried what "palestinians" do on a daily basis? Wonder how long it would take to put an end to violence? 50 years?

How about a week or less. US was doing allright a couple of weeks ago when it seemed to support Sharon. Now they don't seem to get the picture. One of their embasies in Peru just got it so maybe one of these days they'll wake up and smell the coffee.

In other words help the Isralis get the terrorists in the West Bank and Gaza strip. Wipe them out!!!!!!!!! Whatever it takes!!!!!!!!!!!

NewsGuy
03-20-2002, 11:05 PM
Originally posted by Flame

I realize that sounds heartless... but how long does a person remain with refugee status? Globally, people relocate within months. It's not like plenty of countries wouldn't help these people financially, to get on their feet.

From the photos I've seen of those "refugee camps," they are actually cities -- filthy and crowded like all Arab cities I've seen -- but cities nonetheless.

But the status of "refugees" is artificially maintained as a ruse to slaughter Israelis.

By contrast, look at how Israel treated the Jews who came to Israel as refugees from Arab countries -- they were immediately absorbed as brothers and settled in as regular citizens immediately. They were never termed "refugees" for any amount of time.

ibrodsky
03-21-2002, 06:19 AM
I'm reading Conor Cruise O'Brien's history of Israel, "The Siege."

Though he is very unfair to Ariel Sharon, he actually felt Israel's war in Lebanon was justified, and that the PLO was ultimately responsible for the refugee camp massacres.

Here is a quote relevant to this discussion (Chapter XXXIV, page 633):

"Among unsophisticated people, with little interest in international politics, but under the shock of televised violence, there was, I believe, little realization that the PLO was what this was all about, or awareness even of what the PLO was in relation to Israel. Without such realization or awareness, the war seemed just a brutal and unprovoked attack by a powerful state on a harmless and defenseless nieghbor, Lebanon. This impression of wanton barbarity on the part of Israel was reinforced by the frequent references to Israeli attacks on "refugee camps." There was very little realization, among the general public, that these refugee camps--in fact, urban areas inhabited by Palestinians--were also military and paramilitary bases, containing people dedicated to the eventual destruction of Israel, and the present destruction of individual Israelis, wherever possible. If you didn't realize that, then a country that kept on attacking "refugee camps" sounded like a monster of a country."

ibrodsky
03-21-2002, 06:22 AM
P.S.: Let's hope General Zinni sees the futility of a "cease-fire" with terrorists, and that Israel responds with massive force to today's terrorist attack in Jerusalem -- the latest in a string of massacres of Jewish civilians by evil Palestinians.

McSceptic
03-21-2002, 07:37 AM
How long do people remain refugees? I suppose religious Zionists would say that the Jews were refugees for nearly two thousand years before they got their home back.

The Palestinans may be thinking along the same lines. It would be a question who has the greater capacity to endure. Or perhaps who has the most options.

As to reparations, cases of lost property due to war have certainly suceeded after half a century, but I haven't heard of anything much longer than that. I don't think any Russian emigres have got property back that was lost in the Russian revolution (the first one).

I believe Israel was looking to the US to bail it out when it came to making reparations to the Palestinian refugees, but obviously the peace process stalled before than happened.

ibrodsky
03-21-2002, 08:58 AM
Originally posted by McSceptic
How long do people remain refugees? I suppose religious Zionists would say that the Jews were refugees for nearly two thousand years before they got their home back.


Actually, the meaning of the word "refugee" is well established and can be found in the dictionary. A "refugee" is someone who flees to a foreign country for safety or to escape persecution.

Contrary to your supposition, the vast majority of Jews sought acceptance in the countries that hosted them. I don't know any Jews anywhere, for example, who think Jews living in the US are "refugees."

Clearly, the Palestinians use the word "refugee" to win support among gullible Westerners. The number of Arabs who personally fled Israel or the territories and are still alive is quite small.

Most of the Palestinian "refugees" are phony. They are more accurately refugees from the Arab governments that persecute them in order to keep the conflict alive. For example, in Lebanon Palestinians are not permitted to own land or participate in dozens of occupations. These laws are designed to prevent them from becoming satisfied with their lives.

If you are so concerned about reparations, what about reparations to Israel and Israeli victims of terrorism?

McSceptic
03-22-2002, 02:55 AM
I don't think we disagree about the definition of refugee. I said that religious Zionists might define all Jews not resident in Israel as refugees, at least in a spiritual sense. I've appended the UN definition of Palestinian refugees below.

Most Jewish people would disagree of course, having chosen to live in Europe or America.

As to reparations, it's not a problem for me. It'll be the US who will pick up the tab for the resettlement of Palestinian refugees, and for any Israelis who get displaced, as part of any final peace settlement.

The UN definition is as follows (and remember, they're partly to blame for this unholy mess!):

For operational purposes, UNRWA has defined Palestine refugee as any person whose "normal place of residence was Palestine during the period 1 June 1946 to 15 May 1948 and who lost both home and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 conflict." Palestine refugees eligible for UNRWA assistance, are mainly persons who fulfil the above definition and descendants of fathers fulfilling the definition.

In May 1951, UNRWA inherited a list of 950,000 persons from its predecessor agencies, the United Nations Relief for Palestine Refugees, the International Committee of the Red Cross and the American Friends Service Committee.

In the first 4 months of operations, UNRWA made deductions to 860,000, based on "painstaking census efforts", "fraudulent claims" and a desire to "remove undeserving individuals from its relief rolls."

The 1948 registered refugees and their descendants now number over 3.8 million, and mainly reside in the West Bank, Gaza, Jordan, Lebanon or Syria. These are the refugees covered under UNRWA’s mandate.