PDA

View Full Version : Arafat wants to be buried on the Temple Mount


Mediocrates
12-08-2003, 11:02 AM
So there is now a proposal to block all burials in the old city. It's really a restatement of laws that already exist.

http://www.israelnn.com/news.php3?id=54092


Proposal: No Burial In Old City
18:28 Dec 08, '03 / 13 Kislev 5764


MK Aryeh Eldad (National Union) proposed a bill in the Knesset yesterday that would forbid burial on the Temple Mount. The initiative came in response to reports that Yasser Arafat intends to be buried there so as to strengthen the Arab claim to Judaism's holiest site. "I intend to prevent the transformation of the Temple Mount into a Palestinian national site," Eldad said.

MK Eldad's proposed law would also prohibit burial within Jerusalem's Old City. He said that the Husseini family, which claims ownership to a burial plot adjacent to the western wall of the Temple Mount, is prepared to hand it over to Arafat. Feisal Husseini, who died in May 2001, was buried in a burial chamber above the Hasmonean Tunnels, together with his father and grandfather. The chamber is adjacent to the Mount, with which it shares a common wall and window.

It should be noted that shortly before Husseini's burial, Noam Federman appealed to the Supreme Court against Husseini's burial adjacent to Judaism's holiest site. Federman maintained that Israeli law allows burial only in a recognized cemetery, and certainly not in an archaeological site such as the Temple Mount. The three-justice panel - Dorner, Matza, and Chief Justice Barak - rejected the suit, explaining that it was filed too late for it to be properly reviewed; that the coffin was already on its way to the site; and that the burial would technically be not on the Temple Mount, but adjacent to it.

"Jewish tradition from the Second Temple period has forbidden burial anywhere within the walls of the Old City," MK Eldad explained. "The only exceptions were the Jewish residents of the Old City killed during the War of Independence.

"The Arab occupiers are attempting to bury their dead within the Old City walls and on the Temple Mount as a means of creating political and religious facts on the ground in Jerusalem," Eldad said. "Many Jews want to be buried in the land of their fathers and request that their bodies be brought to Israel for burial, and I similarly propose that Arafat be returned to Egypt, his homeland, for burial."

Oh Jerusalem
12-08-2003, 11:03 AM
Originally posted by Mediocrates
So there is now a proposal to block all burials in the old city.
That would still allow enough time for one last burial tonight.

wellofvow
12-08-2003, 11:47 AM
I sure hope that lawyers and rabbis and rabbi-lawyers can come up with something better in order to block Arafat's burial in Jerusalem. It would be obscene. An insult of titanic proportions. For a change, can't Jews do "This is a humiliation that cannot be tolerated"?

We should be up in arms instead of wishy-washing around.

And how did the Husseini family get these burial plots? Where are the deeds of sale? How many of these plots are there anyhow?

Yuck!

L@mplighterM
12-08-2003, 01:32 PM
I’d allow burial of Arafat in my backyard if it were done within the next 48 hours.

Canajew
12-08-2003, 03:03 PM
I vote for Arafat to be burried Eichman style. Really it must be done.

wellofvow
12-09-2003, 09:41 AM
Originally posted by L@mplighterM
IÂ’d allow burial of Arafat in my backyard if it were done within the next 48 hours.

And you wouldn't be afraid that all your plants would, forever after, bloom with black flowers?

No way would I allow that poisonous collection of cells to decompose in MY backyard! ickickick

Oh Jerusalem
12-09-2003, 10:09 AM
Leave him there long enough and he might turn into oil.

Oh, the irony! :p

Mediocrates
12-09-2003, 10:48 AM
The key point is that Arafat is attempting to create facts on the ground. Were he to be buried on the temple mount it would end effectively any discussion even about shared control over the area. It would in short become an Arab site permanently and forever. I wouldn't be shocked if it became the site of a new pilgrimage.

Canajew
12-09-2003, 11:07 AM
Originally posted by Mediocrates
The key point is that Arafat is attempting to create facts on the ground. Were he to be buried on the temple mount it would end effectively any discussion even about shared control over the area. It would in short become an Arab site permanently and forever. I wouldn't be shocked if it became the site of a new pilgrimage.

and that is exactly why Arafat should be burried at sea.

Mediocrates
12-09-2003, 11:08 AM
Or France or Egypt or any number of other places.

Oh Jerusalem
12-09-2003, 11:17 AM
Originally posted by Mediocrates
Or France
That would be a comfort for Suha. :rolleyes: