PDA

View Full Version : Four Star General Clark - QUITS


RichardP
02-10-2004, 08:39 PM
AP: Clark Abandons Presidential Race
AP NewsBreak: Wesley Clark Drops Out of Race for Democratic Presidential Nomination
The Associated Press




WASHINGTON Feb. 10 — Wesley Clark, the novice politician with four-star military credentials, abandoned his presidential bid Tuesday after two third-places finishes in the South.
The retired Army general will return to Little Rock, Ark., on Wednesday to announce his departure from the race, said campaign spokesman Matt Bennett. Clark will pledge to work closely with the Democratic Party to support the presidential nominee and other candidates across the country.


"He made this decision after discussing it with his family and his staff," Bennett said. "It was a very difficult decision to make obviously. He did it after the final results were in for Tennessee and the decision is final."
He is the fifth Democrat to drop out of the race. Five remain: Front-runner John Kerry, John Edwards, Howard Dean, Dennis Kucinich and Al Sharpton.
The news of Clark's departure broke shortly after he spoke to supporters, promising to keep waging fights on behalf of Democratic causes. Clark didn't know at the time he had finished third in Tennessee, along with his third-place finish in Virginia. The results sealed his fate.
New to politics, Clark may still have a future. At 59, he is young enough for another race and, with his military experience, he might fit on a wartime Democratic ticket.
Clark entered the race in September, a late start for a neophyte campaigner, but he quickly rose to the top of polls of Democrats and others considering an alternative to President Bush. He decided to skip the Iowa caucuses to focus all of his efforts on New Hampshire, a move that some friends and family now call a mistake.
In appealing to voters, Clark relied almost entirely on his 34 years in military service, which included serving as supreme allied commander of NATO. He promoted his wartime record, from being wounded in Vietnam in 1970 to running the bombing campaign in the war in Kosovo in 1999, as the kind of experience needed with American soldiers in Iraq and concerns about security at home.
Supporters touted other qualities his Southern roots and his status as a Washington outsider they contended that made Clark the candidate most likely to defeat Bush. Plus, he provided another forceful voice in condemning the war in Iraq, which he frequently called unnecessary, reckless and wrong.
"I would not have gone into Iraq in the first place," he said. "My position was that Iraq was not an imminent threat. I would have concentrated on Osama bin Laden."
For a latecomer, Clark had enormous fund-raising success. He raised nearly $15 million in 2003 and started January with at least $10 million left and the prospect of raising nearly $1 million per week as the first elections neared.
Yet Clark's inexperience as a candidate caused him problems. On the first full day of his campaign, Clark said he probably would have voted for the Bush-backed Iraq resolution but then, a day later, insisted he never would have voted "for this war." His supporters were left confused while his detractors grew elated. Questions about his stand on the war in Iraq never ceased.
"I bobbled the question," he later told The Associated Press. "Even Rhodes scholars make mistakes."
Still, he won Oklahoma's primary, and finished second in Arizona, New Mexico, North Dakota shining a light on what Democrats' believe is Bush's vulnerability on foreign policy.
Another rub following Clark was whether he was a Republican at heart and a Democrat only by necessity. He explained that, as a military man, he did not have a party affiliation. On the other hand, he had voted for Republican presidents, had complimented Bush, and had considered joining the GOP after retirement.
Day after day of retail politicking in New Hampshire came to naught for Clark. He finished third in the nation's first primary with just 12 percent of the vote, well behind Kerry and Dean and only slightly ahead of John Edwards. He was the choice of voters who considered terrorism or national security the top issue, but that was just one in 20.
Clark turned to the South and West, regions where veterans were plentiful. But by then Kerry had perfected his appeal to their brothers in arms and had taken on the aura of a consensus candidate for those determined to select a winner against Bush.
Clark was born in Chicago in 1944 and grew up in Little Rock, Ark. His father died when he was 4. He finished first in his class at West Point, studied as a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford, earned a Silver Star for heroism in Vietnam, and served as a White House fellow.
Associated Press Writer Douglass K. Daniel contributed to this report.

Kev
02-11-2004, 03:25 AM
found this posted by a Persian fellow in a forum and it is seen as an overture to Iran....?


Kerry Says He Will Repair Damage If He Wins Election (http://www.tehrantimes.com/archives/Description.asp?Da=2/8/2004&Cat=2&Num=026)



Kerry Says He Will Repair Damage If He Wins Election


WASHINGTON (Mehr News Agency) -- The office of Senator John Kerry, the frontrunner in the Democratic presidential primary in the U.S., sent the Mehr News Agency an e-email saying that Kerry will try to repair the damage done by the incumbent president if he wins the election. The text of the e-mail follows.

As Americans who have lived and worked extensively overseas, we have personally witnessed the high regard with which people around the world have historically viewed the United States. Sadly, we are also painfully aware of how the actions and the attitudes demonstrated by the U.S. government over the past three years have threatened the goodwill earned by presidents of both parties over many decades and put many of our international relationships at risk.

It is in the urgent interests of the people of the United States to restore our country's credibility in the eyes of the world. America needs the kind of leadership that will repair alliances with countries on every continent that have been so damaged in the past few years, as well as build new friendships and overcome tensions with others.

We are convinced that John Kerry is the candidate best qualified to meet this challenge. Senator Kerry has the diplomatic skill and temperament as well as a lifetime of accomplishments in field of international affairs. He believes that collaboration with other countries is crucial to efforts to win the war on terror and make America safer.

An understanding of global affairs is essential in these times, and central to this campaign Kerry has the experience and the understanding necessary to successfully restore the United States to its position of respect within the community of nations. He has the judgment and vision necessary to assure that the United States fulfills a leadership role in meeting the challenges we face throughout the world.

The current Administration's policies of unilateralism and rejection of important international initiatives, from the Kyoto Accords to the Biological Weapons Convention, have alienated much of the world and squandered remarkable reserves of support after 9/11. This climate of hostility affects us all, but most especially impacts those who reside overseas. Disappointment with current U.S. leadership is widespread, extending not just to the corridors of power and politics, but to the man and woman on the street as well.

We believe John Kerry is the Democrat who can go toe-to-toe against the current Administration on national security and defense issues. We also remain convinced that John Kerry has the best chance of beating the incumbent in November, and putting America on a new course that will lead to a safer, more secure, and more stable world.





Repair Damage in Iran? :confused:

ibrodsky
02-11-2004, 04:31 AM
Originally posted by Kev
found this posted by a Persian fellow in a forum and it is seen as an overture to Iran....?


Repair Damage in Iran? :confused:

The Islamo-fascists will have a field day if Kerry is elected president.

I'll make a prediction--and please hold me to it: if John Kerry becomes president terrorism will increase, the US economy will hit bottom, and by the end of Kerry's term the people will be desperate for a president who will be tough in dealing with rogue states.

However, I'm still optimistic that by this November most Americans will realize that America's security is the Number One issue and that the Democrats, as the anti-war party, are unqualified to lead us during this critical period.

As for Clark, it's amazing... the Left portrays the military as led by a bunch of kill-crazy oafs. In Clark you can see that there are liberals and career bureaucrats at the top. But the Democrats would never choose a former General unless he renounced the military.