Well I bet alot of that is debatable of what is stolen and what was not.Originally Posted by Mediocrates
Well I bet alot of that is debatable of what is stolen and what was not.Originally Posted by Mediocrates
Originally Posted by Mil
I have lived all my life in the States yes. I do read alot though and check my information.Have you lived all your life in the States? You exact philosophy on this particular issue is very limited and is really bounded by the fact that you really don't know of what is it you are talking about exactly
I have family and friends in Europe though.
The new generation of Germany owes the world nothing.Whatever Germans have done will stick with the for many years to come and they do owe the world for all this.
The new generation is innocent. You are taxing people who did nothing in the war.
Originally Posted by Mil
Alot. Ask away.And what is it that you know?![]()
"Balkanization"? Where did you learn this word? Is that something that you have heard from your parents or is that something that you thought you understood from Bill O'Reilly?
Serbs, for example, happen to be Balkan and just happen to be very white. As are Bosnians, Croatians, Slovenians, Montenegrans, and Macedonians.
Does this help: ?
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=balkanization
All peoples of this earth commit such tragedies.Which exact injustice are you talking about? You mean that of killing 45,000,000 million people 60 years ago?
For you to point only one group is wrong and hypocritical.
Originally Posted by Alban
No not really. They've been fighting these cases in courts for more than 60 years according the laws of this country. If it's all made up as you assert then I think someone would have uncovered the world's biggest fraud by now. Now before you run out to barrage me with all the zundlesite and norm finkelstein and tony judt and counterpunch and david irving websites that say just that, save it - I've seen them all.
OK, I think he's had his time here. Time to cut him off and get back to real discussion. He's just as dumb as the German high school kid who came in here looking to be offended a month or so ago.
( sighs)Originally Posted by minusthejihad
You are very insulting and aggressive.
I have not insulted one time.
I have just asked questions in seeking of understanding.
![]()
You have been very offensive. Stop lying and playing a victim. You have been the aggressor from the moment you popped in here. Please see Womble's response to you in another thread where he explains just what a Schmuck you've been in detail. Thanks.Originally Posted by Alban
The fact that the Jews of Europe were disposessed (even from their very lives, let alone their posessions and properties) in Europe is beyond dispute. And anyone who disputes it means to be insulting because I just cannot believe that they haven't read or heard what happened there to Jews 60 years ago!Originally Posted by Alban
So, If a German killed my father and took his property 60 years ago and he left that property to his son after he died, then I wouldn't have a right to claim my inheritance?Originally Posted by Alban
Or even more straight forward, if my father was not killed but the German took his property during the war and then left it to his son, My father would not have the right to re-claim his property after the war?
Is that what you believe Alban?
Idealism increases in direct proportion to one's distance from the problem.
Author: John Galsworthy 1867-1933, British Novelist, Playwright
It has nothing to do with "politicial power" especially when another country is trying to boycott another for no apparent reason.Originally Posted by Alban
On the contrary its Sweden that is voilating Israel's soverignty by trying to impose a boycott on the country. And that's all in the context of Sweden's past role in Nazi collaboration.
Sweden was in a precarious position, any hostility towards the nazi's and nazi-Germany could overrun their country. They acted as cowards, yes perhaps so, but don't forget the US TOO traded with nazi-Germany untill it got attacked by the Japanese... on the other hand Sweden was a refuge for many people fleeing the nazi's, such as Willy Brandt. It's a bit comparable to Switserland.Originally Posted by Mil
Northlander probably is right that Swedish were less antagonised by the nazi's than by the Russians, and I think Hitler's germanic race-theory (Swedes much closer to the "ideal Germanic type" than the Germans...) and order appealed to many Swedes. But somehow Swedes were rational enough not to be tempted by nazism, and its militantism seems unswedish.
it's all a bit ambiguous, and I don't know how Sweden coped with this after the war... at least if you compare to France, where a part of the establishment sided with the invador while another part fought the nazi's with their life. Here it was a necessity to cope with the past after the war, punish most highranking traitors and forgive others, in the Soviet-Union traitors got a one-way ticket to the eternal hunting fields or to Siberia. I don't know if there was ever a "denazification" in Sweden.
Well allow me to say some common sense.Originally Posted by Mediocrates
It happened 60 or so years ago get over it.
The new generation had nothing to do with it.
When will it be enough to put past angers away?
I answered the thread go look.Originally Posted by minusthejihad
Originally Posted by Reffo
It happened a long time ago and Europe is very different today.The fact that the Jews of Europe were disposessed (even from their very lives, let alone their posessions and properties) in Europe is beyond dispute. And anyone who disputes it means to be insulting because I just cannot believe that they haven't read or heard what happened there to Jews 60 years ago!
How much is enough?
Putting that innocent son on the street is enough to fulfill your anger?So, If a German killed my father and took his property 60 years ago and he left that property to his son after he died, then I wouldn't have a right to claim my inheritance?
Killing a wrong with another wrong does not make things right.
Originally Posted by Leon
It has nothing to do with "politicial power" especially when another country is trying to boycott another for no apparent reason.
On the contrary its Sweden that is voilating Israel's soverignty by trying to impose a boycott on the country. And that's all in the context of Sweden's past role in Nazi collaboration
Sweden has every right to rule itself the way it sees fit.
And we have every right to respond accordingly - especially when that "rule" infringes on our own soveriengtyOriginally Posted by Alban
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks