OOOOOOH craon, and the likes of you wouldn't know anything about hypocrisy would ya?Originally Posted by craon
OOOOOOH craon, and the likes of you wouldn't know anything about hypocrisy would ya?Originally Posted by craon
Idealism increases in direct proportion to one's distance from the problem.
Author: John Galsworthy 1867-1933, British Novelist, Playwright
The question was posed to forcerecon "which would you prefer", innocent Israelis or innocent gazians. He responded justly that he prefers neither. Nationalists on the other hand tend to show a preference. Nationalists are much more likely to sacrifice innocents on the other side, in order to save innocents from their own nation. This "special love" you mention also creates preference. Nationalism throughout history has as a result caused great conflicts, as well as 'preferences' in killing innocents of nation x over innocents of nation y.
Non sequitur. How does it follow from the fact that I am anti-excessive nationalism---> that I prefer everything else (i.e. Osama bin laden's fellow travelers).
I also dont like lazy people. Can you make the comment that I thus prefer "Osama bin Laden's fellow travelers" because they have nothing close to the laziness of the average american?
Hamas and Fatah kiss and make up, vow never again to hurt each other....
...no I'm only kidding, Hamas group has accused a key figure in the rival Fatah faction of trying to assassinate Prime Minister Ismail Haniya as he returned to Gaza.
As a youth I used to weep in butcher's shops.
"We did not join this movement to become minister but rather to become martyrs " - Ismail Haniya Palestinian Prime Minister
Cool, so no hefty pension plans for them then.
As a youth I used to weep in butcher's shops.
Do you speak from your own experience at the front line of an armed conflict, or is this simply anecdotal?
Sorry for my cynicism, but our campuses are full of Marxists who hackney the anti-nationalism argument to support everything from illegal immigration to cutting off aide for Israel.
BTW In my heart of hearts I appreciate Einstein’s sentiment in your signature line: "....negotiate with the Arabs". On the other hand, I'm reminded that he spent the last half of his life trying to refute the legitimacy of quantum physics. It just goes to show that even history's most brilliant minds can be stupefyingly wrong sometimes.
But it frequently goes hand in hand. German nationalism was also supposed to be only a "special love of homeland, german culture, etc" but it easily leads to hatred of the other, despite the fact that it is not included in your definition. This is also not a unique case. Nationalists tend to care more about their own than the other at the least, and in the extreme form an antipathy to the other.
Islamists, despite their claim of anti-nationalism, developed their extremism historically in a way parallel to extremist nationalism. The umma is at the base of it Islamic nationalism, where they emphasize their love of their Islamic nation. This does not per se that they will hate the other outside of this nation, but historically this was so. Ideological Marxism is a utopia that never came to be. Despite the flaws in their ideology, I dont think that thier egalitarian view of nation was one.
Experience at the front line of an armed conflict.
As for as einstein- himself an anti-nationalist zionist-- the fact that he was wrong in quantum physics (an understandable error) does not mean that we should take the rest of his views with a grain of salt. There was a time when a large portion of the world thought that the earth was the center of the universe. That doesnt mean we should ignore the advice of every person in the 1400s except for Copernicus and his small group of followers. Quantum physics is in itself an unbelievable notion, particularly before it was accepted scientifically (like the heliocentric universe). To not value the words of einstein because of his skepticism with regard to this extraordinary science is an extremely bodacious step.
Bosnia, Chechnya, Kosovo, and Kurdistan , yususlovian, greek-turkish wars, Abkhazia etc, etc. In the great majority of world conflicts, if religion is not the cause then nationalism is. Of course, all of these are also just 'exagerrations'... Just like Islam using violence is just an exaggeration, there is no relationship between the two...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks