Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: The 5 fastest growing defense budgets

  1. #1
    Senior Member Mediocrates's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    N Carolina
    Posts
    30,616

    The 5 fastest growing defense budgets

    http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/c...?story_id=4051

    People’s Republic of China

    Annual military budget: $103.9 billion (2005 estimate)
    What they’re spending on: Weapons and military technology. Between 2002 and 2006, China purchased over $14.6 billion in arms. Between 2001 and 2005, China increased its annual military budget by nearly 126 percent. In addition to buying a few destroyers and submarines from Russia, China has also been developing its own nuclear-powered submarines that can fire off nuclear ballistic missiles. At its current rate of military expansion, China could have the world’s largest navy by 2020. Earlier this year, the Chinese also performed an unannounced test of a new antisatellite missile that drew fierce criticism from the United States and the international community.
    What to watch: Boots on the ground. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA), with 2.25 million active-duty members, is the largest army in the world. But as large as its active-duty forces are, the Chinese military has decreased in size in the past two decades by more than 1.6 million soldiers. The reduction has allowed the Chinese military to use its increased budget to focus on training, leaving the force smaller and more professional.
    Why it matters: The Taiwan Strait. China is determined to use its new wealth to modernize its armed forces, and a possible battle with the United States over Taiwan is the main motivating factor.


    United States of America

    Annual military budget:
    $481.4 billion (FY 2008 estimate)
    What they’re spending on: Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which have cost U.S. taxpayers about $610 billion since Sept. 11, 2001. Then there are global antiterrorism measures, missile shields, personnel expenditures, and advanced defense technologies such as the next-generation aircraft carrier and unmanned aerial vehicles. The result: U.S. defense spending increased 54 percent this year over 2001—excluding the costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
    What to watch: Emergency spending and plans to grow the Army. Since the war on terror began, emergency supplemental packages have been tacked on to normal defense spending, putting vast expenses beyond normal congressional review. Just this year, President George W. Bush requested nearly $200 billion extra for Iraq and Afghanistan through next year—on top of the normal defense budget of $481.4 billion. There are also plans in the works for increasing the size of the U.S. Army by 74,000 soldiers by 2010, a project estimated to require an additional $2.6 billion per year.
    Why it matters: Overextension. Iraq and Afghanistan are straining the U.S. military’s global operations. Increased funding and more troops is the only way the United States can maintain its forces in the “global war on terrorism” while still preparing conventional defenses against potential future adversaries.


    Republic of South Africa

    Annual military budget:
    $3.69 billion (2005 estimate)
    What they’re spending on: Weapons and military readiness. The military budget increased 102 percent between 2001 and 2005, mainly for arms and other military equipment. The country spent virtually nothing on imported arms in 2003 and 2004, but it acquired $315 million worth of weapons and equipment in 2005 and a further $862 million in 2006. South Africa has also gotten help from the United States in the form of technical training assistance, funds for aircraft parts, and military medical training.
    What to watch: Peacekeeping. The African Union has plans for five regional rapid deployment forces ready for use by 2010, and South Africa is spearheading the effort with a unit that could involve as many as 10,000 soldiers. South African peacekeepers are currently deployed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Central African Republic, and Darfur.
    Why it matters: Regional stability. As befits sub-Saharan Africa’s largest economy, South Africa wants to be the military powerhouse of the region. However, a 2002 report revealed that only 3,000 of the country’s 76,000 active-duty soldiers could be deployed for combat operations due to inadequate equipment and the fact that as many as 60 percent of the country’s soldiers could be infected with HIV.


    Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

    Annual military budget:
    $1.67 billion (2005 estimate)
    What they’re spending on: AKs. Venezuela’s international arms purchases jumped from an estimated $71 million between 2002 and 2004 to more than $4 billion between 2005 and 2007, expenditures not counted in the official budget numbers. Venezuela purchased 100,000 Kalashnikovs from Russia last year, along with 24 fighter jets and 35 helicopters. And a new Kalashnikov factory in Aragua state, capable of producing as many as 30,000 automatic rifles a year, is scheduled to be completed by 2010.
    What to watch: The militias. Although President Hugo Chávez has not increased the country’s overall active troop strength, he has founded two public militia groups in addition to the country’s regular National Reserve: the Francisco de Miranda Front (FFM) in 2003 and the Territorial Guard in 2005. As of mid-2006, the FFM had around 10,000 members and the National Reserve and Territorial Guard together were around 2 million strong. Combined, this “people’s army” is officially meant to defend against such unlikely events as an attempted invasion by the United States, which Chávez claims is imminent. Critics say the groups are being used to suppress internal dissent, however.
    Why it matters: It could destabilize neighboring countries. Chávez isn’t just arming people in his own country; he’s also giving aid and arms to “revolutionary” groups in Colombia. Analysts worry that weapons from Venezuela will make their way over the border to leftist FARC rebels in that country. Chávez also has close ties to Evo Morales. In May 2006, the Bolivian president agreed to construct as many as 24 new military bases in Bolivia with Venezuelan assistance—despite objections from Chile, Paraguay, and Peru.


    Republic of India

    Annual military budget:
    $21.7 billion (2005)
    What they’re spending on: Everything. India is the world’s No. 2 arms importer after China, shelling out more than $10 billion on arms imports between 2002 and 2006. Its defense spending has jumped 53 percent since 2001.
    What to watch: Its reserve forces. In addition to the country’s 1.3 million active troops, India has more than doubled its reserves since 2001 to 1.1 million additional soldiers.
    Why it matters: It’s a sign of intentions. With growing threats of instability in neighboring Pakistan, a continuing conflict in Kashmir, and military modernization in China, not to mention a simmering Maoist insurgency, India may just be responding to what it sees as gathering dangers. Expect greater defense spending and international arms purchases in the future.

  2. #2
    farmall
    Guest
    Looks like good news all around, especially with respect to India.

  3. #3
    Christian_Iran
    Guest
    About that Chinese nuclear submarine.

    http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/3540

    Recently, when a Chinese submarine popped up undetected in the middle of a Pacific Ocean exercise, dangerously close to the U.S.S. Kitty Hawk, American military chiefs were left dumbfounded and red-faced, according to UK newspaper, Daily Mail.

    According to senior Nato officials, the incident caused a sense of sudden fear in the U.S. Navy, as officials realized the seriousness of the encounter. The U.S. apparently had no idea just how sophisticated China's fast-growing submarine fleet had become, or that they even posed such a threat.

    "The great dragon has awakened."

  4. #4
    varian
    Guest
    That dragon has been alive and well for decades, and some defense analysists have been warning about such for about that long. China is also assuming all the maritime choke points around the globe, and may soon make passage through certain areas akin to a toll road. As the influence of the US wanes, China is definitely the best bet for the emerging lone superpower. The EU may be able to counter this threat if it can survive its looming economic struggles. China is the real deal, and can no longer be looked at as a secondary competitor in any activity that it endeavors.

  5. #5
    farmall
    Guest
    When a country is not practical to dominate, it becomes reasonable to cut deals. A strong China is a healthy force for order in Asia.

  6. #6
    ShimonG
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by farmall View Post
    When a country is not practical to dominate, it becomes reasonable to cut deals. A strong China is a healthy force for order in Asia.
    I dont agree. China is not a status quo power but an expansionist one. Hopefully, its "strength" will not grow to the extent that it seeks to wipe out other countries (the peaceful tibetans being a prime example).

  7. #7
    farmall
    Guest
    Tibet is small, trivial, and expendable. Power matters, and the small fry are what get crushed when important empires act. Tibet is a buffer state, and empires naturally acquire their neighbors to protect their borders.

    Asia should be ruled by anti-Islamic entities which are modern corporate states. These states should be peacefully integrated into the globalized economy and have interlocking investments with US and European business entities. What they do with minor countries should not be cause for disrupting useful power relationships.

  8. #8
    Senior Member bararallu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    NY & TA
    Posts
    6,774
    China is slowly flexing it's muscles, we see it in Burma, we see it in the sea of Japan, but most of all we see it through their proxy, North Korea. It's no secret that if the Chinese want something, they push the Kim button.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Mediocrates's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    N Carolina
    Posts
    30,616
    Yes and no. Its defense budget is a quarter of ours for a country with more than 4x the people. Huge standing armies are expensive. Especially where there is little strategic purpose to doing so. On the other hand there's nothing to suggest that the Chinese have any intention or even the operational ability or interest to deploy nuclear submarines beyond their own coast. In other words, unless you're going to put them out 'there' somewhere, they don't serve an entirely logical purpose. You can swim boomers around the China sea all you want but if they're always one-three days from harbor then that kind of defeats the purpose of them. In the same vein, China has far fewer nuclear missiles than one would expect. Probably in the sub 300 range. Why? Because who are they going to fight with them? Japan? Taiwan? South Korea? The American Navy? The Russians? India? China by itself is too big an opponent for anyone to truly have a strategic military intent on - apart from the general sense of targeting it under an overarching strategic plan like the former US 'SIOP' which is obviously no longer used.

    China is playing a much different game. An almost asymmetric one. Today there are ~4-5000 PLA troops in Sudan protecting Chinese oil interests for example. But they have a very specific and mercenary purpose. A positively 19th Century colonialist one, ripped right from the pages of England's Asian history. This is how and why they will project their power.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Iran worried over Syrian air defense failure in IAF strike
    By ForceRecon79 in forum In The News
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-08-2007, 10:23 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-23-2007, 08:00 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-28-2006, 10:51 AM
  4. From Jane's Defense Weekly
    By The Indian in forum In The News
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-22-2005, 04:20 AM
  5. Support Said Growing for Iraq Exit Plan
    By Yasmeen in forum U.S. Politics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-19-2005, 02:08 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •