Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Influential Turkish imam critisizes Gaza flotilla

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Givatayim, Israel
    Posts
    2,416

    Influential Turkish imam critisizes Gaza flotilla

    Reclusive Turkish Imam Criticizes Gaza Flotilla

    SAYLORSBURG, Pa.—Imam Fethullah Gülen, a controversial and reclusive U.S. resident who is considered Turkey's most influential religious leader, criticized a Turkish-led flotilla for trying to deliver aid without Israel's consent.

    Speaking in his first interview with a U.S. news organization, Mr. Gülen spoke of watching news coverage of Monday's deadly confrontation between Israeli commandos and Turkish aid group members as its flotilla approached Israel's sea blockade of Gaza. "What I saw was not pretty," he said. "It was ugly."

    Mr. Gülen said organizers' failure to seek accord with Israel before attempting to deliver aid "is a sign of defying authority, and will not lead to fruitful matters."


    Mr. Gülen's views and influence within Turkey are under growing scrutiny now, as factions within the country battle to remold a democracy that is a key U.S. ally in the Middle East. The struggle, as many observers characterize it, pits the country's old-guard secularist and military establishment against Islamist-leaning government workers and ruling politicians who say they seek a more democratic and religiously tolerant Turkey. Mr. Gülen inspires a swath of the latter camp, though the extent of his reach remains hotly disputed.

    His words of restraint come as many in Turkey gave flotilla members a hero's welcome after two days of detention in Israel. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan of the ruling Justice and Development Party condemned Israel's moves as "bullying" and a "historic mistake."

    Mr. Gülen said he had only recently heard of IHH, the Istanbul-based Islamic charity active in more than 100 countries that was a lead flotilla organizer. "It is not easy to say if they are politicized or not," he said. He said that when a charity organization linked with his movement wanted to help Gazans, he insisted they get Israel's permission. He added that assigning blame in the matter is best left to the United Nations.

    Mr. Gülen has long cut a baffling figure, as critics and adherents have sparred over the nature of his influence in Turkey and the extent of his reach. Leading a visitor on Wednesday past his front corridor—adorned with a map of Turkey, a verse from the Quran and a photograph of a Turkish F-16 jet over the Bosphorus—he portrayed himself an apolitical teacher. "I do not consider myself someone who has followers," he said.

    Born in eastern Turkey in 1941, Mr. Gülen became a state-licensed imam at 17, after three years of formal education and studies with Sufi masters. In a Turkey largely under the sway of a military-secularist establishment, he built a national organization of Islamic study and boarding halls, gaining support of many wealthy Muslims but at times running afoul of the law.

    While in the U.S. in 1999 for medical treatment, he was charged in Turkey with attempting to create an Islamic state— anathema under Turkey's secularist constitution. He stayed in Pennsylvania, where he now lives on a 25-acre estate in the Pocono Mountains. Over the years, he said, he has left the estate twice.

    Mr. Gülen preaches nonviolence, dialogue between Western and Muslim worlds, and an educational tradition that combines study of science and Islam. His newspaper columns, weekly Internet sermons and other messages have been collected into more than 60 books. His adherents number, by various estimates, three million to eight million.

    Followers have established hundreds of schools in more than 100 countries and run an insurance company and an Islamic bank, Asya, that its 2008 annual report said had $5.2 billion in assets. They own Turkey's largest daily newspaper, Zaman; the magazine Aktion; a wire service; publishing companies; a radio station and the television network STV, according to Helen Rose Ebaugh, a University of Houston sociologist and author of "The Gülen Movement." She says followers donate up to one-third of their income to independent Gülen-linked foundations.

    Ms. Ebaugh said Mr. Gülen doesn't sit on the boards of Asha bank nor any foundation or editorial boards of Gülen-sympathetic magazines, newspapers or television stations. In the interview, the imam said he had no financial interest in any holdings.

    Mr. Gülen's detractors see him as a cult-like leader whose empire aims to train an Islamic elite who will one day rebuild the Turkish state. Soner Cagaptay, a Gülen critic who is a Turkey analyst at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, says the Turkish police force may be largely influenced by the imam through Gülen sympathizers in key positions—effectively creating a counterbalance to Turkey's powerful military, a secularist bastion.

    "I am not a leader of a faction or someone who would cause some state officials to follow me despite their official duties," Mr. Gülen said in the interview.

    The U.S. has "immense ambivalence" about Mr. Gülen, said Graham Fuller, an ex-Central Intelligence Agency officer who is a resident consultant at the Rand Corp. in British Columbia.

    "On the one hand they do perceive him as very moderate and doing many positive things," Mr. Fuller said. But Washington has long thrown its lot behind the secularist followers of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, he says, viewing them "as the only narrative to what Turkish politics is all about."

    The U.S. State Department declined to comment about Mr. Gülen for this article.

    In 2007, U.S. Homeland Security moved to deny Mr. Gülen permanent-resident status in the U.S., rejecting his claim of exceptional ability as an educator. "The record contains overwhelming evidence that plaintiff is primarily the leader of a large and influential religious and political movement with immense commercial holdings," the government wrote.

    Mr. Gülen won on appeal after getting 29 letters of support, including one from Mr. Fuller.

    The imam disputed Homeland Security's characterization. He goes only so far as to provide guidance to those who ask, he said.

    The 2002 election of the Justice and Development Party, or AKP, opened a new era for Mr. Gülen and those he inspires, given their common foe in the military-secularist establishment.

    The AKP says it has no political ties to Mr. Gülen. The imam says critics have linked him, falsely, to Turkey's current and previous leaders. "I do not have and have never had any relationship with a movement that has political aspirations," he said. "I am just a Turkish citizen."

    Last month, Mr. Gülen's followers founded the Assembly of Turkic American Federations in Washington, a lobbying and umbrella organization for some 180 local non-profit foundations around the U.S. involved in education and culture.

    An English-language Turkish newspaper reported that Mr. Gülen has told his followers they couldn't visit him on his Poconos estate if they didn't first donate to their local congressman. Mr. Gulen denies making the remark.

    Mr. Gülen said that for Muslims, benefiting their community is both an Islamic and humanitarian duty, and that he would be happy if those who respect him support their lawmakers in the name of democracy and humanitarianism.

    "I hear that some people in the United States consider Turkey as sitting at the epicenter of radicalism," Mr. Gülen said. The new federation's lobbying would aim "to reflect through sincere, pro-dialog and open-minded people the true nature of Turkey's realities."
    Interesting. An influential Islamic leader who preaches non-violence, condemns anti-Israeli activities, supports dialogue with the West and clearly differs with the AKP despite some ideological connection points. Could he be a possible antidote to Erdoganism?
    “This is a reality but I won’t deal with it in terms of recognizing or admitting it.”

    Khaled Mashaal, Hamas leader

  2. #2
    andak01
    Guest

    Re: Influential Turkish imam critisizes Gaza flotilla

    I have tremendous respect for Mr. Gulen. When I mentioned him as an example of a moderate, I was called an Islamist. I'm glad to see he's making headlines.

  3. #3
    ToYgUn
    Guest

    Re: Influential Turkish imam critisizes Gaza flotilla

    Turkish ministers split by Gülen remarks on Gaza flotilla

    Sunday, June 6, 2010

    ANKARA - Hürriyet

    Comments from religious leader Fethullah Gülen on the Israeli raid on the Gaza aid flotilla have continued to divide Turkey’s ruling party, as the country’s deputy prime minister and culture minister offered Saturday differing interpretations on the matter.

    “What has been done is despotism; committing murder by ending the lives of those beautiful people,” Deputy Prime Minister Bülent Arınç said. “This is piracy. Our [Foreign Affairs] Minister said this is banditry at the UN Security Council with all his power. Now, they ask me what the speech of the respectable Master Hoca [Gülen] means. The Master Hoca speaks the truth as always.”

    Culture and Tourism Minister Ertuğrul Günay, meanwhile, said: “So it seems that things are perceived in that sense when looked at from afar. When you live it within, it is perceived as we do.”

    When asked whether Gülen made this evaluation because he resides in the United States, the minister said, “I do not know.”

    Gülen, a Turkish religious leader living in Pennsylvania, said last week that the tragedy occurred because the activists failed to seek an agreement with Israel before approaching Gaza.

    Gülen also said, “[The delivery was] a sign of defying authority, and would not lead to fruitful outcomes."

    http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.p...als-2010-06-06

  4. #4
    ToYgUn
    Guest

    Re: Influential Turkish imam critisizes Gaza flotilla

    Pro-Israeli Gülen?

    Friday, June 4, 2010

    YUSUF KANLI

    Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is mad at articles and stories in the Turkish media questioning whether his government could have demonstrated a better performance regarding the pre-crisis “Freedom Flotilla” developments as well as it could have undertaken a better crisis management capability after the tragic and bloody Israeli assault on Mavi Marmara, of the ships in the six-ship flotilla, in international waters that resulted with the deaths of at least nine Turks.

    If someone just wonders since Israel made absolutely clear from the first day that it would not compromise from the security of Israel and whatever required would be undertaken to stop the effort to break the blockade of Gaza and this position of Israel was conveyed to Ankara through diplomatic channels in Ankara, as well as in Washington, whether as a state with the responsibility to provide security of its citizens the Turkish state and government must have provided security escort to the “Freedom Flotilla” or at least must have warned the Turkish participants of the “humanitarian Gaza operation” of the grave potential consequences of making such a trip, both the government spokespeople and the pen-slingers of the government in the media immediately start condemning such legitimate considerations as efforts aimed at distracting the public attention from the Israeli state terrorism.

    Should someone writes about the domestic political background of the “Gaza operation” and questions whether the Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief, or IHH, which organized the Turkish leg of the “Freedom Flotilla”, was a foundation closer to the Felicity Party or Saadet Party of Numan Kurtulmuş than Erdoğan’s AKP and probably the prime minister and the ruling party fearing domestic political consequences just could not risk to stand against the Turkish participation in the flotilla despite repeated communication with Israel clearly showed that the Jewish state could indeed undertake a bloody operation to stop the flotilla, the answer is an outright “there are people in the Turkish media supportive of Israel” accusation.

    Definitely the current and rather emotional and sentimental evaluation will gradually be replaced with common sense and people will try to seek answers to what indeed has happened before the flotilla left Turkey for Gaza; what were the discussions between Turkey and Israel on the developments; how Israelis intercepted the flotilla in international waters of the Mediterranean contrary to international law; how Israel applied such a berserk operation and used live ammunition on civilian activists on Mavi Marmara in clear violation of all law norms; consequent developments and Turkey’s diplomatic interventions and the release of the activists by Israel.

    If there is still some degree of democracy in this country; if there is still some breath of free media and courage in some people to talk on matters that the prime minister and his government would not like, there will be such discussions. Is it not at least intellectual responsibility to question how something indeed has developed even if the outcome might not be as pleasant as might have been anticipated?

    The prime minister and his AKP might not like to hear perhaps what their spiritual leader Fethullah Gülen has said on the developments. Indeed, reports in the allegiant media on the remarks of Gülen to the Wall Street Journal were just short of declaring him insolent. Was Gülen pro-Israeli as well when he described the bloody Israeli raid on the Mavi Marmara “What I saw was not pretty… It was ugly” but stressed that organizers' failure to seek accord with Israel before attempting to deliver aid "is a sign of defying authority, and will not lead to fruitful matters”?

    The government and the prime minister who have been in efforts to consolidate all power in their hands by getting rid of the separation of powers principle through a set of constitutional amendments offered to a September referendum must be able to grasp the reality that as long as Turkey retains some degree of democracy there will be critics making some nasty comments about what they have done, how they have done and as well as why they have not acted sufficiently enough for the protection of Turks despite imminent and clear threats…

    Last, perhaps no one would expect to hear from Gülen but it was interesting to read in the WSJ that he has said “I hear that some people in the United States consider Turkey as sitting at the epicenter of radicalism.” If Gülen has started to complain about Turkey sinking in radicalism, can we still say there is no problem in this country?


    http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.p...len-2010-06-04

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-31-2010, 10:39 AM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-29-2009, 05:25 AM
  3. Post Gaza Politics
    By Y. Shulamith in forum Peace Think Tank
    Replies: 619
    Last Post: 03-20-2009, 03:23 PM
  4. Foreign intervention created Gaza
    By Mediocrates in forum War in Gaza
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-13-2009, 03:23 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-24-2004, 07:52 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •