Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 121 to 125 of 125

Thread: To Those Who Advocate More Concessions By Israel For the Sake of Peace ...

  1. #121
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    6,886

    Re: To Those Who Advocate More Concessions By Israel For the Sake of Peace ...

    Quote Originally Posted by watOn
    Maybe. Or maybe not, maybe most settlers are law-abiding Israeli citizens and as such they will respect any withdrawal decision if it is upheld by the Supreme Court and only a small minority will try to oppose a withdrawal by force
    Even law abiding citizens don't like to be economically disadvantaged particularly if neither they nor the country that they are loyal to and love won't get the peace that supposedly they would get in return for unilateral withdrawal. And worse, they would actually get more violence in return from the Arabs.

    Interestingly I am not the only one advocating this: ....
    You know watOn, unlike some people on this forum (and elsewhere), I actually respect Ehud Barak. I actually think that he had no choice but to offer the peace deal that he offered Arafat in 2001. I also think that he had to unilaterally withdraw from Lebanon. Why? Because he had to give peace a chance. But he should now know better. His sacrifices did not bear fruit and they actually backfired. He brought violence, extreme violence onto the heads of Israelis in return, not peace. Only subsequent firm action by successive Israeli leaders brought the situation under control. Not Barak's gestures. So he should have learnt from those outcomes. Wasn't Einstein who said that the first sign of madness is to repeatedly do the same things while expecting different outcomes?

    I rather side with the sentiments of Gideon Sa'ar and Danny Dayan (your own quote) ...

    Also responding to Barak's comments, Education Minister Gideon Sa'ar severely criticized the defense minister, saying that his "position did not represent the government's position, one that is in a clear minority both in the government and in the coalition."

    "It's strange how some people are willing to toy with such a dangerous notion after the utter failure of [Israel's] unilateral disengagement from the Gaza Strip," Sa'ar added.

    In another response to Barak's comment, the head of the Yesha Settlement Council Danny Dayan said that "anyone speaking about a unilateral withdrawal from the West Bank seven years after the catastrophe of the disengagement is a lost cause."

    "Barak has learned nothing from his own mistake in Lebanon and from [former Prime Minister Ariel] Sharon's in Gaza. The 94-MK coalition needs to be used to bolster Israel, not to weaken it."
    Quote Originally Posted by watOn
    Yet Singapore is neither fragmented like the Palestinian State in the WB (areas A & B) would be nor its neighbors can potentially exert control over it due to this territorial fragmentation
    Ok, we disagree on this one too. With good will on both sides, they could have a workable sovereign state of their own. But like I said, and you keep on ignoring my point, even if you are right, they could rejoin Jordan (instead of Israel). It would make much more sense because Jordan already has a large Palestinian population, the Jordanians are fellow Arabs and fellow Muslims. That would work much better for all sides unless their real aim is the destruction of Israel as a Jewish state. In which case, becoming part of Jordan would not suit them. But if that's the case, why should we, you and I care?

    Quote Originally Posted by watOn
    I think this overoptimism regarding the lack of a clear geographic division between both states and/or the prospects of a single state is very dangerous for Israel's future. Whether it comes from the right or the +972 blog-like bleeding heart liberals is not relevant, IMO
    Look watOn, I already acknowledged that my position carries risks too but IMO, it is a smaller risk than what you advocate.

    My problem with your position is that you seem to feel that EVERYTHING is up to Israel. That Israel should think for the Arabs too. Look watOn, the Palestinian Arabs are adults. They have been offered two comprehensive peace deals which would have given them their own state on 97% of the West Bank, just in the last decade. Instead of accepting, they chose the path of violence (as always) and no compromise. And it's still not too late to get a similar deal, even if not with Netanyahu, but now the onus is on them to take the initiative. They really need to bite the bullet (pardon the pun) and show that they really do want peace. Take a leaf out of Sadat's book and declare openly that they are prepared to reconize Israel as the nation state for and of the Jewish people and that they no longer demand the right of return. I believe that if Abbas would do that, Netanyahu too would be forced to make concessions. Otherwise he would lose the next elections (which are about 1 year away) and his successor would compromise.

    But if Abbas continues on his current non compromising path, he will cause his people to miss this opportunity too and who should be to blame for that? Everybody else but not them? Give me a break already ...

    Tell me watOn, were you, yes YOU, ever offered opportunities and you made the mistake of ignoring those opportunities? I know I am guilty and I am sure you too made the same mistake. Who did you blame when you realised your mistake? Who did hou expect to fix up the mess? Surely not someone else? Surely you blamed yourself and you had to deal with your own mess, NO?! In the same way, If the Palestinians keep on making their usual mistake of not willing to compromise, they will have to deal with their own mess at the end, not Israel. So whether the land that they would have would constitute a viable state or not, Israel will NOT be the one who would pick up the pieces for them by making them Israeli citizens. The Palestinian Arabs would have to deal with THEIR own mess. And if they would choose the violent path again, Israel can dish it out at least as well as they can so that won't be a viable solution for them.
    Idealism increases in direct proportion to one's distance from the problem.
    Author: John Galsworthy 1867-1933, British Novelist, Playwright

  2. #122
    Senior Member Pleepleus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Syracuse
    Posts
    269

    Re: To Those Who Advocate More Concessions By Israel For the Sake of Peace ...

    Quote Originally Posted by wat0n View Post
    Well if you actually think Israel is willing to risk a one-state reality you are very mistaken. I see an evacuation or leaving Israeli citizens living under Arab rule more likely than self-destruction.
    There would not be any risk of a one-state reality at all. You would have Israel and you would have areas under Palestinian control. And Israel could maintain that situation forever if necessary until the Palestinians come to their senses. And if they don't come to their senses, they got what they deserve for their intransigence.

    Quote Originally Posted by wat0n View Post
    Yet Singapore is neither fragmented like the Palestinian State in the WB (areas A & B) would be nor its neighbors can potentially exert control over it due to this territorial fragmentation.

    I think this overoptimism regarding the lack of a clear geographic division between both states and/or the prospects of a single state is very dangerous for Israel's future. Whether it comes from the right or the +972 blog-like bleeding heart liberals is not relevant, IMO.
    They would only be fragmented pending the Palestinians negotiating in good faith. The fragmentation is important to prevent the West Bank from turning into another Gaza. If the Palestinians misbehave, you clamp down on their inter-communications.

    If Israel were to unilaterally ethnically cleanse (an evil act) all of its citizens from the other side of the security fence as you propose, the Palestinians would have zero incentive to negotiate. They would have nothing to lose from continuing the conflict. Also, your request for a "clear geographic division" stems from the racist belief that Jews have no right to live in Judea and Samaria.

    If on the other hand, the potential size of their future state were to keep dwindling, then they better start negotiating pronto or risk ending up with what they currently control with only minor revisions.

    And an Israel that retains the Jordan Valley, Dead Sea coast linked up to East Jerusalem would be a 1000 times more secure than the Israel you propose.

  3. #123
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    6,886

    Re: To Those Who Advocate More Concessions By Israel For the Sake of Peace ...

    Quote Originally Posted by watOn
    Yet Singapore is neither fragmented like the Palestinian State in the WB (areas A & B) would be nor its neighbors can potentially exert control over it due to this territorial fragmentation
    So what? If the Arabs stay stubborn and don't make peace, because they think that time is on their side and that they are laying a trap for Israel, then they are wrong again and it will backfire on them. Instead of ending up with one state of their own (the West Bank with a narrow road corridor to Gaza) they may end up with 10 smaller contiguous statelets. That would be another possible outcome.

    Like I said above, watOn, the Arabs themselves will have to wear the consequences of their own intransigence and folly, NOT Israel. Period.
    Idealism increases in direct proportion to one's distance from the problem.
    Author: John Galsworthy 1867-1933, British Novelist, Playwright

  4. #124
    Senior Member dayag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Artzot haBrit
    Posts
    3,337

    Re: To Those Who Advocate More Concessions By Israel For the Sake of Peace ...

    Clinton rejects Barak's unilateral withdrawal plan.

    WASHINGTON - US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Thursday rejected the notion of unilateral Israeli steps towards separating from the Palestinians.

    "We have discouraged unilateral action from both sides," said Clinton when asked about the possibility during a press conference while on trip to Denmark. "The United States believes there is no substitute for direct talks between the parties."

    Several leading Israeli voices, including most recently hints by Defense Minister Ehud Barak, have raised the possibility of unilateral Israeli withdrawals from the West Bank - though presumably they would not be as extensive as those sought by the Palestinians - in the face of a long-time stalemate in negotiations to reach a settlement....
    source: http://www.jpost.com/International/A...aspx?id=272250
    "If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand wither, let my tongue cleave to my palate if I do not remember you, if I do not set Jerusalem above my highest joy." (Ps. 137: 5-7)"

    "Any generation in which the Temple is not built, it is as if it had been destroyed in their times" (Yerushalmi, Yoma 1a).

  5. #125
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    312

    Re: To Those Who Advocate More Concessions By Israel For the Sake of Peace ...

    yes, I agree. The unilateral withdrawal from Gaza strip was a failure, a failure predicted by leftists such as Yossi Beilin.
    The way to go should be in the formula "land for peace", meaning withdrawals as part of a peace treaty.
    Its a pitty there isn't much of a partner among the Palestinians right now.
    I think The Saudi Arabia plan provides the best hope of achieving some results.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-08-2009, 07:31 AM
  2. The Leaving for the Sake of the Return
    By intenseGaze in forum Religion/Culture
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-05-2006, 04:48 AM
  3. Rabbi visits Mosque for solidarity's sake
    By genghis_tom in forum In The News
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-14-2006, 12:29 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-03-2005, 06:07 PM
  5. Israel Forum - The Ultimate Advocate
    By danholo in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-01-2003, 10:02 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •