Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: Arafat's main objective's to have a Palestinian State WITHOUT A PEACE-TREATY

  1. #1
    Flame
    Guest

    Arafat's main objective's to have a Palestinian State WITHOUT A PEACE-TREATY

    Found this on another message board... the poster nailed it on the head.

    Peres's fallen for Arafat's tricks, agn....

    Arafat's main objective's to have a Palestinian State WITHOUT A PEACE-TREATY WITH ISRAEL, saving his, & the Palestinians', image in the Arab/Moslem world from the profound shame & humiliation of having to sign & honour an agreement with the Jews.

    This "State", which won't be demilitarized, as some naifs dream, will almost immed make war upon Israel, to "redeem its unliberated soil".

    Aftr all, the problems not finally a simple dispute abt real-estate, its fully existential: it's over whether there continues to be a Jewish State on this planet or not, not over the size & shape of it.

    Therefore, it shd be seen clearly that this "plan"'s futile & destructive & it ought to be rejected amid gales of laughter. The Palestinians regard bloodshed as the 1 legitimate road to their State; they'll accept no substitute, since exclusively thereby - in slaughter - can their precious "honour" be found.

    Arafat'll ratchet up the violence now in a bid to necessitate international intervention (which he knows'll overwhelmingly favour his side, as it's always done in the past), with a view to attaining his State unilaterally, without any Israeli conditions, negotiations, or even correspondence....

  2. #2
    Senior Member NewsGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,805

    Re: Arafat's main objective's to have a Palestinian State WITHOUT A PEACE-TREATY

    Originally posted by Flame
    Peres's fallen for Arafat's tricks, agn....
    When will poor Peres finally learn?

  3. #3
    Flame
    Guest

    The EU pushes for pal without cease fire or peace treaty

    3. EU AND ISLAMIC LEADERS DIFFER ON CONDEMNING ISRAEL

    European and Islamic leaders meeting in Istanbul could not find a
    common position by Wednesday on whether to condemn recent Israeli
    strikes against Palestinian targets, but European Union officials
    unveiled a new plan for immediate recognition of a Palestinian state
    without requiring a cease-fire.

    On the last day of a two-day meeting in Istanbul with government
    officials from 72 European and Islamic countries, Muslim leaders
    yesterday called on the PLO-friendly European countries to take a
    stronger role in confronting Israel in the Middle East peace process.

    The conclave of European nations and members of the Organization of
    the Islamic Conference gathered in Turkey to try to bridge the gaps
    between the Muslim world and the West in the wake of the September 11
    attacks and to address Islamic charges that American support for
    Israel and other Western policies provoked the mass terror strikes.

    In a final statement to be released later Wednesday, Islamic leaders
    insisted on a strong condemnation of Israel, a European Union
    diplomat said on condition of anonymity. But European nations and
    Turkey opposed condemning a country that is not present to defend
    itself.

    EU officials, meanwhile, outlined their emerging peace plan that
    would call for the immediate recognition of a Palestinian state. The
    European plan, unlike the US position, does not call for an initial
    Palestinian crackdown on militants and a cease-fire.

    "The Europeans think there is no solution in the current policies of
    the Israeli government," said French Foreign Minister Hubert Vedrine,
    who formulated the Mideast plan.

    The EU proposal signals an abandonment of their previous unified
    stand with the US behind the Tenet security plan and the Mitchell
    report recommendations for securing a sustainable truce and resuming
    negotiations.

    It comes just as foreign ministers from two key EU members make their
    way to the region for diplomatic talks with Israeli and Palestinian
    leaders to gauge the positions of both sides before EU foreign
    ministers meet in Brussels next Monday.

    British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw arrived in Israel on Wednesday
    for a two-day visit and said this afternoon that the Palestinians
    must take the first steps toward a solution to the Middle East
    conflict.

    Straw will be followed by German Minister of Foreign Affairs Joschka
    Fischer, who is scheduled to arrive in Israel on Thursday to urge the
    sides to end the violence and resume negotiations.

    Both Straw and Fischer have reportedly expressed opposition to the
    EU's new French-inspired proposal and stressed the need to coordinate
    policies more closely with the US.

    After meeting this morning with Israeli Defense Minister Binyamin
    Ben-Eliezer in Tel Aviv and then Foreign Minister Shimon Peres in
    Jerusalem, Straw said the Palestinian Authority has driven
    Palestinian terrorism over the past six months, and thus should be
    able to curtail it. The first step should be to make the lives of
    individual Israelis much more secure, Straw asserted.

    Straw was scheduled to meet separately with Prime Minister Ariel
    Sharon today, but the Israeli leader was sidelined with a bad bout of
    the flu and the two decided to speak by telephone instead. Straw will
    meet with PLO chairman Yasser Arafat in Ramallah this evening and
    assured he would tell the Palestinian leader that he must do more to
    reduce violence.

    In a joint press appearance with Peres, Straw said the wave of
    suicide attacks that Israelis have endured over the past 16 months
    were "almost impossible to imagine." He said that if Britain - like
    Israelis - faced "weekend after weekend" of the sort of terror
    attacks that struck Omagh in Northern Ireland several years ago,
    British policies there would be dramatically different.

    "The first steps that have to be taken are to make the life of the
    people of Israel much more secure, and that means clamping down on
    the terrorism which comes from the occupied territories," Straw said.

    Straw refused to condemn the Israeli raids in the Gaza Strip on
    Wednesday in which five Palestinians were killed during IDF
    operations aimed at routing out the fledgling Kassam-II missile
    industry. When asked about the incursions, he said: "I regret the
    death of anybody in this region and elsewhere. It's possible to reel
    off similar lists on both sides and very long lists of people who
    have been killed in suicide bombings."

    Straw also said the EU should not adopt a position at odds with the
    US. "If the international community is divided... that will make the
    path to peace much more difficult," he said.

    The European proposal would "consider a Palestinian state not as the
    end of the process but as the beginning of something," said Josep
    Pique, the foreign minister of Spain, which currently holds the
    rotating EU presidency.

    British Embassy spokeswoman Mena Richman said Straw was willing to
    listen to new ideas, "but Britain's position is that Mitchell is the
    road map."

    On Tuesday, Peres unveiled his own plan, negotiated with Palestinian
    Parliament Speaker Ahmed Qurei [Abu Ala] that contains elements of
    both the Mitchell and EU plans. The Peres-Abu Ala plan calls first
    for a cease-fire, to be followed by universal recognition of a
    Palestinian state eight weeks later, then one year of negotiations to
    determine that state's exact boundaries.

    Sharp differences have surfaced however between Peres and Abu Ala
    over the latter's demand for a "side letter" from a third party
    giving assurances that the basis of the negotiations on borders will
    be a return to the pre-1967 Green Line.

    The second stage of the proposal, which calls for the establishment
    of a Palestinian state on the 42% of Judea/Samaria and Gaza now under
    PA control, also calls for the two sides to recognize each other on
    the basis of UN Security Council resolutions 242 and 338. But Abu Ala
    is also demanding a letter of assurances, presumably from the US,
    that the border will eventually be drawn along the 1948 armistice
    lines.

    The Peres-Abu Ala proposal has few takers so far. Sharon has publicly
    come out against it because of its firm deadlines.

    Members of Peres' own Labor party who might have looked favorably on
    the plan are now having second thoughts as well, since he failed to
    mention the existence of the "side letter" issue when he recently
    distributed an outline on the document to Labor MKs.

    According to a source close to Abu Ala, the EU and US were interested
    in the plan. But Arafat has not accepted it yet and several PA
    officials oppose it.

  4. #4
    Senior Member NewsGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,805

    Re: The EU pushes for pal without cease fire or peace treaty

    Originally posted by Flame
    EU officials, meanwhile, outlined their emerging peace plan that
    would call for the immediate recognition of a Palestinian state. The
    European plan, unlike the US position, does not call for an initial
    Palestinian crackdown on militants and a cease-fire.

    After meeting this morning with Israeli Defense Minister Binyamin
    Ben-Eliezer in Tel Aviv and then Foreign Minister Shimon Peres in
    Jerusalem, Straw said the Palestinian Authority has driven
    Palestinian terrorism over the past six months, and thus should be
    able to curtail it. The first step should be to make the lives of
    individual Israelis much more secure, Straw asserted.

    In a joint press appearance with Peres, Straw said the wave of
    suicide attacks that Israelis have endured over the past 16 months
    were "almost impossible to imagine." He said that if Britain - like
    Israelis - faced "weekend after weekend" of the sort of terror
    attacks that struck Omagh in Northern Ireland several years ago,
    British policies there would be dramatically different.
    Very interesting that French hypocricy appears to be causing a split in European positions.

    Look at the nerve of the French demanding to reward the Palestinians for mass murdering innocent Jews. This is really a very clear statement of the French that they consider the Arab terrorism against Israeli citizens to be an positive achievement to be rewarded.

    That is who the French really are: Enemies of the Jews and adversaries of the US and the rest of the civilized world.

    This is not surprising, of course, because Arab France has been serving their Arab and Islamic brothers for many decades now. But it is always unfortunate to hear the French official anti-semitism go unpunished.

  5. #5
    takeo
    Guest
    Newsguy, your view is as hypocritical as the US accusing Cuba it is a poor country after they imposed a criminal embargo on it for 40 years without an justified reason and punished other countries who wish to trade with Cuba.
    You accuse the palestinians don't want peace and that you are ready to accept peace, at the same time you defend daily israeli terrorist attacks on the PA, on prisons(!!!) (which means of course that the pa can't even arrest anymore terrorists), and at the same time you want the destruction of the al-aqsa mosque and the total eviction of the palestinians from palestina (in "takeo's peace plan"). Your position is really the same as Sharon's: hypocritical. After Israel occupied the territories in 1967 and oppressed the pals for 35 years, nobody will find it strange that they turn to violence, and that an independant palestine will be the only way bringing peace. That is the position of France to bring peace, not the destruction of Israel. Straw is more bound by American interests but even he subsribesthe european plan that the palestinian independance should be a start of any peace-process. And if someone needs to be punished for 35 years of oppression it is Israel, so don't see independance as a reward, it is their right.
    And Spain, Belgium, Greece, Netherlands, Scandinavia, Italy, etc. have exactly the same opinion as France, as well as almost all the UN-members. a world-wide anti-semitic plot or all being paid by the Arabs? (actually all the BNP of all Arab countries together is less than a 10th of US bnp)
    or could it be that the there is really something wrong with the policy of Israel?

  6. #6
    Flame
    Guest
    Takeo... I have to assume that you are very young, that you don't know anything about the world before you were born, and that you have never stepped foot in America. You obviously know nothing about Cuba or why the United States have taken the actions it has.

    Guess the pals problems aren't arafat's fault... and Castro is an innocent too. Takeo, do yourself a favor and don't make comments about things you know nothing about other than by reading propaganda.

  7. #7
    takeo
    Guest
    Flame at the moment i am at nueva gerona where my friend lives, in casa jaleidis near the beach, in a place your free government will not allow you to visit.
    and about Arafat, i am not going to repeat myself, read above and stop reading one-sided propaganda.
    (but by the way i am anxious to know what are the good reasons for the embargo against Cuba, did it terrorise the US or what?)

  8. #8
    Senior Member NewsGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,805
    "Newsguy, your view is as hypocritical as the US accusing Cuba it is a poor country after they imposed a criminal embargo on it for 40 years without an justified reason and punished other countries who wish to trade with Cuba."

    Well, in my mind, your desire to blame the Israeli victims of Arab terrorism is hypocritical.

    One thing I've notice about your position is that there is never accountability. According to you, there is always someone else to blame for the failure of your positions.

    Cuba's troubles wouldn't, by any chance, have to do with the fact that it is a communist country and that communism has turned out to be a colossal failure worldwide. Someone else must be blamed and, of course, the 2 countries in your strange world that are always to blame are Israel and the US.

    Just like it is never the fault of the Palestinians that they are mostly an illiterate, poverty-stricken people with a corrupt governement and problems of overpopulation and Islamic extremism. In your world, it is always the fault of Israel and the US.

    If Castro has a pimple on his ***, it must be the fault of the US. If Arafat gets syphillis, then it is Israel's fault. And if Arafat gets syphillis from Castro, then it is definitely a CIA-Mossad plot.


    "You accuse the palestinians don't want peace and that you are ready to accept peace, at the same time you defend daily israeli terrorist attacks on the PA, on prisons(!!!) (which means of course that the pa can't even arrest anymore terrorists), and at the same time you want the destruction of the al-aqsa mosque and the total eviction of the palestinians from palestina"

    Yes, that's correct. I support Israeli military action to eliminate Arab terrorism. I don't see that as being contrary to wanting an end to war.


    "nobody will find it strange that they turn to violence, and that an independant palestine will be the only way bringing peace."

    I find it strange that the Arabs would turn to terrorism when Israel already withdrew its troops out of Palestinian-controlled territory and offered the Palestinians an independent state.


    "And if someone needs to be punished for 35 years of oppression it is Israel, so don't see independance as a reward, it is their right."

    No. Giving the Palestinians parts of the Jewish homeland while the Palestinians are mass murdering Jews daily, is rewarding Arab violence. Plain and simple. It is not within the Palestinians' right to mass murder Jews as they are doing.


    "And Spain, Belgium, Greece, Netherlands, Scandinavia, Italy, etc. have exactly the same opinion as France, as well as almost all the UN-members."

    In general, Europe is an anti-Israel, anti-Semitic place, where these countries couldn't care less if all the Jews live or die, or whether Israel is a Jewish or Muslim state, just so long as they keep on getting their Arab oil from their Arab masters.

    Do you really think that in the Nethrerlands or Scandinavia they would be terribly upset if in 10 years there would be a vote by the Arab population to turn Israel into another Ayatolla-controlled Iran?

    Already Europe coudn't care less if Jews are blown up just sitting in a pizza parlor, or at a disco, or in a city bus, or in a shopping mall. What exactly did they do in Europe when these events happened? Nothing. A few nice words about how incomvenient terrorism can be, then back to business as usual in their safe little pubs and outdoor cafes where they think they are safe from Arab terrorism.

    I don't see Europe as having the moral authority to be Israel's judge and jury and to give away Jewish lands to the Arabs. Nonetheless, it is happening unfortunately.

  9. #9
    takeo
    Guest
    "One thing I've notice about your position is that there is never accountability. According to you, there is always someone else to blame for the failure of your positions. "

    Hey, that sentence could be easily used against you. If Israel is searching war with all its neighbours of course that's "the Arabs", if Israel started two wars in 1955 and 1967 of course they are victims of Arab provokation, the un-resolutions are a consequence of world-wide anti-semitism, it has nothing to do with the actions of Israel, the fact that those anti-semites don't let us expulse all the palestinians and blow up the al-aqsa mosque is the guild of those anti-semites, everyone criticising israel is payed by the arabs, in fact everything going wrong with Israel is due to "anti-semitism", every action israel took in its history is always ligitimated and the israeli are always victim, whatever happens.
    if palestinians can't leave their town and human rights groups are criticising israel it's all arafat who did it, israel did always the right thing, the fact that sharon didn't keep his election-promise is of course as well the fault of arafat, if palestinians are deprived of any accomodations, investment or employment by israeli occupiers that's all Arafat who did it, in fact if tourists don't come to israel anymore its all the fault of arafat, the 1967-invasion was the work of Arafat, etc.
    i
    about Cuba: do you deny that the us has imposed a harsh embargo and punishing foreign companies if they wish to do business with Cuba, do you think this has no effect on the economy? and if communism destroys itself why still imposing a trade-embargo? (besides in most communist countries that turned to capitalism the BNP is now only half of 1990).

    "Yes, that's correct. I support Israeli military action to eliminate Arab terrorism. I don't see that as being contrary to wanting an end to war. "
    well you can't win war against an entire people and certainly can't make peace with them by bombing them.
    the fact that israeli are murdered and even more palestinians are murdered is a consequence of israely greedyness to refuse to leave the occupied territories, simple. Not criticising israel would be rewarding it for denying un-resolutions and illigal occupation.

    "Do you really think that in the Nethrerlands or Scandinavia they would be terribly upset if in 10 years there would be a vote by the Arab population to turn Israel into another Ayatolla-controlled Iran"

    yes they would be upset, and even more, the us and eu would interfere to save israel, what they didn't do for the palestinians. besides, as i told you, this won't happen. Your concern is however that arabs combined with the israeli left-wing will have a political majority and finally make an end to israeli expansionist policy.
    yeah ,whatever, all europeans are anti-semitics and paid by the Arabs, whatever!!! they would care a lot more about anti-israeli terrorism if israel would finally accept the un-resolutions and comply to the world's demands to stop occupation and act according to the geneva-convention.

  10. #10
    Senior Member NewsGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,805
    "if Israel started two wars in 1955 and 1967 of course they are victims of Arab provokation, the un-resolutions are a consequence of world-wide anti-semitism, it has nothing to do with the actions of Israel"

    First of all, Israel did not start those wars. Just because Edward Sa'id and Arafat bin Ladin say so, doesn't make it a fact.

    Secondly, yes, most UN resolutions that deal with Israel are, in fact, anti-Israeli and anti-semitic. It is a fact that Israel has been presecuted at the UN for decades now.

    But I don't go around shifting the blame and avoiding accountability, as you do. IMHO, Israel has its own social and economic problems that have nothing to do with the Arabs and their oil-slaves the Europeans. I think every Israeli will agree.

    Now, as far as having its citizens mass murdered by Arab terrorists, this is, of course, something that the Arabs have brought on, and cannot be justified by Arab apologists.

    I think that the Jewish victims of more than 100 years of Arab terrorism have the right to want the Arabs to leave and go back to their 22 other Arab countries.

    "the fact that those anti-semites don't let us expulse all the palestinians and blow up the al-aqsa mosque..."

    So far, Israel has done none of this, and yet, it is being attacked daily by Arab murderers encouraged and protected by their European oil-slaves.

  11. #11
    Senior Member NewsGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,805
    "everyone criticising israel is payed by the arabs"
    Well, many people don't need to be paid by the Arabs to hate Jews and try to bring about the destruction of Israel. They do a fine job all by themselves.

    "if palestinians are deprived of any accomodations, investment or employment by israeli occupiers that's all Arafat who did it, in fact if tourists don't come to israel anymore its all the fault of arafat,"

    You are exactly right about all these statements.

    And, btw - why do you think that it is Israel's responsibility to invest in the Palestinians or provide them with jobs? The Palestinians need to grow up and support themselves instead of going to Israel (of all places) for handouts. Maybe they need to leave Israel and go to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states where petro-dollars run like water, and start new lives in those places.

    I've noticed a curious thing: that the Palestinians can make bombs and make missiles and make grenades, but they can't manage to go out and make a living.


    "about Cuba: do you deny that the us has imposed a harsh embargo and punishing foreign companies if they wish to do business with Cuba, do you think this has no effect on the economy?"

    So what? That's just communist self-pity and shifting the blame again. Most countries in the world are doing business with Cuba anyway. Cuba's problem is that it is one of the very last countries who still have not figured out that they need to get rid of their oppressive communist regime and embrace capitalism and democracy. Here's an example of another leader Castro who would rather see his people starve to death and turn to prostitution of about $5 for anyone with hard currency, rather than to resign like a man and admit failure to benefit his people.


    "the us and eu would interfere to save israel, what they didn't do for the palestinians."

    LOL! The European cowards didn't left a finger for years when Milosevic slaughtered 10's of thousands in their own back yard. They did nothing when the Africans slaughtered 100s of thousands of Tootsies and of course they did nothing when the Germans murdered millions of Jews in WWII. As we all know, the Europeans are pathetic cowards, making all kinds of fancy hypocritical speeches.

    To count on Europe to "save" Israel is like asking cows to fly.

  12. #12
    L@mplighterM
    Guest
    About Cuba Saheed or whatever names your using today there was this little problem regarding a missile base being built there in the 1960's. No problem if they lob a few nukes into the US. But then again you weren’t sitting on your potty in the West Bank or Gaza Strip then. As a matter of fact you weren’t even a gleam in Arafat’s eyes then.



    If you’re in Cuba then I’m on the moon I suppose even an Arab knows what the moon is. Or do they? I suppose you're going to ask which half.


    I don’t know why you Arabs don’t understand the concept of self-defense, that’s a mystery to me. If you’d have been brought up in a nice Jewish household things most likely would be better for you at least you’d understand some basic concepts. It’s bad when your father lies and brainwashes you so you see the world in a distorted way. Your father is an evil man and good thespian that’s how he managed to blind the eyes of the EU.
    Last edited by L@mplighterM; 02-14-2002 at 08:09 PM.

  13. #13
    takeo
    Guest
    "About Cuba Saheed or whatever names your using today there was this little problem regarding a missile base being built there in the 1960's. No problem if they lob a few nukes into the US. But then again you weren’t sitting on your potty in the West Bank or Gaza Strip then. As a matter of fact you weren’t even a gleam in Arafat’s eyes then. "

    did you ever hear of Pigs bay? American terrorist actions in Cuba.
    Russian missiles made that kind of aggressions something of the past.
    but of course you just love terrorists, as long as they're on your side!
    and you can go on cyber-terrorising, it isn't my computer!

    "I don’t know why you Arabs don’t understand the concept of self-defense, that’s a mystery to me. If you’d have been brought up in a nice Jewish household things most likely would be better for you at least you’d understand some basic concepts. It’s bad when your father lies and brainwashes you so you see the world in a distorted way. Your father is an evil man and good thespian that’s how he managed to blind the eyes of the EU. "

    I'm brought up in a nice openminded jewish household (unlike your children, i really pity them) and that's how i learned that occupation and colonisation can never be self-defense, but resisting against an occupying army is.



    "And, btw - why do you think that it is Israel's responsibility to invest in the Palestinians or provide them with jobs? "

    As long as Israel is occupying them and stopping them to move freely and build an own economy: yes!






    "So what? That's just communist self-pity and shifting the blame again. Most countries in the world are doing business with Cuba anyway. Cuba's problem is that it is one of the very last countries who still have not figured out that they need to get rid of their oppressive communist regime and embrace capitalism and democracy. Here's an example of another leader Castro who would rather see his people starve to death and turn to prostitution of about $5 for anyone with hard currency, rather than to resign like a man and admit failure to benefit his people. "

    The helms-burton and toricelli laws prevent anyone(US , European, mexican, Japanese) who invest in Cuba to invest in the US or face severe sanctions. Are you denying this affects the Cuban economy? Anyway cubans are still better off than most of their capitalist neighbours who really live in misery (D republic, Jamaica, Haiti)


    "

    "LOL! The European cowards didn't left a finger for years when Milosevic slaughtered 10's of thousands in their own back yard. They did nothing when the Africans slaughtered 100s of thousands of Tootsies and of course they did nothing when the Germans murdered millions of Jews in WWII. As we all know, the Europeans are pathetic cowards, making all kinds of fancy hypocritical speeches. "

    hey, stop that bull****. Milosevic destroyed Islamic terrorists (terrorists who lived in his own country, not in an occupied country, and had civil rights, unlike the pals) Europe reacted by putting an economical embargo(it is about time they do this to Israel as well!) and later to bomb the coutry to hell, in good company of course of old uncle Sam, always around where the fun is. So you see, Europe has so far been very kind to Israel.
    Millions of Russian soldiers gave their blood to stop Hitler, together with England, if they didn't do so the Jewish people would exist no more. And many French people risked their life to save Jewish victims, while the zionists in Palestine did exactly nothing.






    "First of all, Israel did not start those wars. Just because Edward Sa'id and Arafat bin Ladin say so, doesn't make it a fact. "

    not only they say it, as well the uN and even the US. You can't deny the undeniable.

    "Secondly, yes, most UN resolutions that deal with Israel are, in fact, anti-Israeli and anti-semitic. It is a fact that Israel has been presecuted at the UN for decades now. "

    the un isn't anti-semitic, but israel is treated as any other country, no member of the UN can violate unpunished its rules and occupy other countries. It was to prevent such actions in the future that the un was established, and it reacted the same way against indonesia, Morocco, North-Korea, etc. .


    "Now, as far as having its citizens mass murdered by Arab terrorists, this is, of course, something that the Arabs have brought on, and cannot be justified by Arab apologists. "

    israel has brought more terrorism upon itself by the 1967 invasion and occupation and the very unfair and unlowful treatment of the palestinians.

    "I think that the Jewish victims of more than 100 years of Arab terrorism have the right to want the Arabs to leave and go back to their 22 other Arab countries. "

    Many more Palestinians have been victim of Israeli terrorism and occupation, they have the right to demand an end to Israeli occupation. And nobody ever has the right to etnic cleanse a whole people.



    "So far, Israel has done none of this, and yet, it is being attacked daily by Arab murderers encouraged and protected by their European oil-slaves. "

    No, but if it was upon you, israel would have done this terrible acts, and for sure we wouldn't be talking about Israel in this case, as it would have been destroyed by an islamic coalition.

    a message from my friend: HIJOS DE PUTAS Y MARICONES: COME MIERDA!

  14. #14
    cerulean
    Guest

    Takeo's friend's intolerance

    Originally posted by takeo


    a message from my friend: HIJOS DE PUTAS Y MARICONES: COME MIERDA!
    Your friend uses terrible language. Does he have something against people who are gay? NewsGuy is also right about the flourishing prostitution industry in Cuba (which includes children), so it's highly ironic your friend is referring to "children of whores and fags." Nevertheless, it's not clear to me exactly who your friend has in mind.

  15. #15
    L@mplighterM
    Guest
    He's talking to himself !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 257
    Last Post: 08-28-2006, 08:18 AM
  2. Solutions
    By fred in forum Peace Think Tank
    Replies: 95
    Last Post: 07-12-2006, 08:44 PM
  3. Univ. of Michigan to Host 'Zionism is Racism' Conference
    By L@mplighterM in forum In The News
    Replies: 142
    Last Post: 08-22-2005, 02:39 PM
  4. Bush's Mideast Speech - 6/24 15:45 Eastern
    By cerulean in forum In The News
    Replies: 111
    Last Post: 07-18-2002, 10:56 PM
  5. Bush speech on Middle East
    By Miztiki in forum Israeli-Arab Conflict
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-25-2002, 02:54 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •