It should be noted from the outset that this news item is but one in a catalogue of questionable and discredited claims that have been made over the years on Sudan and the Sudanese conflict. In 1999, for example, the British media widely reported similarly dubious claims that Sudanese government forces
had used chemical weapons in southern Sudan. (1) In 2000, a British newspaper reported that 700,000 Chinese soldiers were being deployed in southern Sudan, a claim similarly publicly exposed as yet another false allegation. (2) Rubin's glib and intellectually undemanding recital of Sudan's alleged involvement in terrorism is tenaciously out of date. He starts off by citing
the Clinton Administration's 1993 listing of Sudan as a state sponsor of terrorism. This listing was questioned from the start by former President Jimmy Carter, who asked to see the evidence for Sudan's listing. He reported that: "In fact, when I later asked an assistant secretary of state he said they did not have any proof, but there were strong allegations." (1) The
simple fact is that the listing was based on the over one hundred CIA reports on Sudan and terrorism from 1993 withdrawn in 1996 as unreliable or having been fabricated. (2) Sudan continues to be listed more as a matter of saving face for Washington than anything else. The gap between American claims about
Sudan, and reality, was also clearly demonstrated by Washington's amazingly inept 1998 cruise missile attack on the al-Shifa medicine factory in Khartoum, an attack acknowledged to have been the result of yet more disastrous American intelligence failures.(3) This level of incompetence led the London 'Times' newspaper to state that such a circumstance "is no great
surprise to those who have watched similar CIA operations in Africa where 'American intelligence' is often seen as an oxymoron." (4) Much the same might be said of Rubin and research skills. All Rubin has done is echo claims that are not just unreliable but which, in the final analysis, amount to
little more than state sponsored propaganda by the former Clinton Administration.(5)
Bookmarks