Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: The International Red Cross condemns the security fence

  1. #1
    Oh Jerusalem
    Guest

    The International Red Cross condemns the security fence

    Red Cross Breaks Silence on Israel Barrier
    2 hours, 57 minutes ago

    By ALEXANDER G. HIGGINS, Associated Press Writer

    GENEVA - The International Red Cross on Wednesday broke its silence on the West Bank barrier being built by Israel, expressing "serious concern" that it illegally cuts Palestinians off from their own land.

    Israel has gone "far beyond what is permissible for an occupying power under international humanitarian law," said the International Committee of the Red Cross.

    Yaakov Levy, Israeli ambassador to international organizations in Geneva, regretted the ICRC's decision to go public and said it threatened to undermine Israel's "good relationship" with it.

    Israel says it needs the barrier — fences, trenches and walls that could run for up to 440 miles — to keep out Palestinian attackers. The Palestinians charge that the barrier constitutes a land grab, since it cuts deep into the West Bank to include several Jewish settlements.

    The Swiss-run agency said Israel should remove the barrier from areas where it passes through Palestinian territory because it violates international humanitarian law. Israel says it needs the barrier to protect against terrorist attacks.

    The barrier gives rise to "widespread appropriation of Palestinian property and extensive damage to or destruction of buildings or farmland" and limits access for thousands of Palestinians to water, doctors, schools, jobs and their own fields, the ICRC said.

    The agency monitors compliance with the universally accepted Geneva Conventions on warfare and occupation, requiring protection of civilian populations, victims and prisoners of war.

    The ICRC usually discusses problems in private with the occupying authorities, as it has done with U.S. forces in Iraq (news - web sites). Only rarely does it go public with its concerns.

    "Israel regrets the ICRC's decision to criticize the anti-terror fence which Israel was forced to erect following a large number of suicide bombings that have caused hundreds of Israeli casualties in recent years," said Levy.

    "There is a danger that the position presented by the ICRC will be turned into a political tool against Israel's measures of self-defense," he added.

    He said, "the ICRC announcement was a departure from the good relationship that it has enjoyed with Israel in recent years, working together for the common goal of improving the humanitarian situation of Palestinians in the midst of a wave of armed attacks against Israel."

    He said it could compromise the ICRC's neutrality.

    Balthasar Staehelin, ICRC delegate-general for the Middle East and North Africa, said the agency decided to make its concerns public after 18 months of observations because the Israelis are continuing to build the barrier.

    "It was important for us to first have a thorough monitoring of the humanitarian consequences that the construction of this barrier entails for the population on the ground, and not to hastily come to any conclusions as soon as any construction starts," Staehelin said.

    The ICRC's conclusion is that the barrier's consequences "are of serious concern and that they indeed are contrary to a number of articles of the Fourth Geneva Convention," the treaty that spells out rules for occupation, Staehelin said.

    "We also have to remember that under international humanitarian law, occupation means basically that an occupying power is administering the territory for the well-being of the population under occupation," he added.

    The ICRC fully recognizes Israel's right to take measures to insure the security of its population, he said.

    "We have repeatedly condemned the deliberate attacks against Israeli civilians — attacks which are intended to spread terror are a violation of international humanitarian law," Staehelin said.

    He declined to suggest other ways that Israel could prevent terrorist attack because it isn't the ICRC's role to advise the Israelis on security, but said the agency had no quarrel with the parts of the barrier in Israel itself.






    Here's is the original ICRC news release.

    Just a reminder of the local Red Cross's neutrality:

    Red Cross Harbors Terrorist
    19:10 Mar. 27, '03 / 23 Adar 5763


    Two International Red Cross workers attempted to prevent the IDF from arresting a senior Islamic Jihad terrorist today. An IDF unit entered a Red Cross building, arrested the terrorist's accomplice, and found two Kalachnikov rifles at the site.

    Two International Red Cross workers attempted to prevent the IDF from arresting a senior Islamic Jihad terrorist today. An IDF Egoz unit entered the Red Cross building in Jenin today, arrested the terrorist's accomplice, and found two Kalachnikov rifles at the site. When the soldiers asked to enter the offices, the two female workers - from the U.S. and Britain - would not allow them to do so, saying no one was inside. The Israelis insisted on entering, and found the terrorist, Shadi Sukiya, armed with a pistol. They arrested him without incident. Sukiya has long been wanted for his involvement in a series of murderous attacks against Jews.

    There have been other incidents in which the PA Arabs took advantage of the Red Cross' status to further terrorist goals. In January 2002, for instance, the IDF captured a wanted terrorist who was taking advantage of the relatively free passage granted to PA ambulances. He was disguised as a doctor, but alert soldiers at a roadblock near Brachah, just southwest of Shechem, detected and arrested him.






    If you think I'm just the typical paranoid Jewish Israeli who senses non-existant hosility, let me remind you of an old quote:

    “If we’re going to have the Shield of David, why would we not have to accept the swastika?" --- ICRC former president Cornelio Sommaruga

    More on the ICRC and it's hsitory of anti-semitism can be found here, amongst many other places.

  2. #2
    Leon
    Guest

    Re: The International Red Cross condemns the security fence

    “If we’re going to have the Shield of David, why would we not have to accept the swastika?" --- ICRC former president Cornelio Sommaruga
    Lets hope the European posters (who accuse Israelis and jews of been paranoid) get the message.

  3. #3
    RichardP
    Guest

    Re: Re: The International Red Cross condemns the security fence

    Originally posted by Leon
    Lets hope the European posters (who accuse Israelis and jews of been paranoid) get the message.
    Absolutely! Insane... it seems they (or those presently in "charge") want history to repeat itself! Never Again!

  4. #4
    Senior Member Mil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    6,242
    Yep - Europeans are passing even more idiotic judjements....

  5. #5
    RichardP
    Guest
    Originally posted by Mil
    Yep - Europeans are passing even more idiotic judjements....
    What makes me want to upchuck is the IRC never had the fortitude to press for the truth, when visiting “Thereisenstadt”; which was nothing but a Nazi propaganda showpiece. But then again, as now, it’s only the Jews!
    As for the Euros; they are of the same mindset!

  6. #6
    Oh Jerusalem
    Guest
    ICRC's perverted priorities
    By DON HABIBI

    Few now doubt that politics motivates the supposedly neutral International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) into excluding Israel's Magen David Adom from full membership. But this unfair treatment is only part of a greater problem.

    A case in point is how the ICRC allocates personnel and budgets worldwide. Such information is provided in its Annual Report 2001. What is striking about this data is how it demonstrates that ICRC allocations are not based on defending human rights and promoting international humanitarian law - at least, not in a way that reflects proportionality, urgency, or a hierarchy of need.

    For North Africa - covering Algeria, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco/Western Sahara, and Tunisia - the ICRC has one office in Tunis, a budget of 2,512,613 Swiss francs, and personnel consisting of five expatriates and 10 locally-hired staff.

    These are the allocations dedicated to a human rights disaster zone, a population of 82 million and covering an area of 6,048,149 square kilometers.

    For Asia and the Pacific - covering Cambodia, People's Republic of Korea, Japan, Laos, Mongolia, People's Republic of China, Republic of Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam - the ICRC has a main office in Bangkok, plus two prosthetic limb workshops in Cambodia.

    The budget for this region is 5,838,991 Swiss francs, and the personnel consists of 17 expatriates and 43 locally hired staff. These are the allocations dedicated to a human rights disaster zone, for a population of 1.7 billion and covering an area of 13,056,235 sq. km.

    For "Israel/Occupied Territories/Autonomous Territories," the ICRC has 13 offices in Jenin, Tulkarm, Nablus, Kalkilya, Ramallah, Jericho, Bethlehem, Hebron, Gaza, Khan Yunis, Majdel Shams, Jerusalem, and Tel Aviv. The budget for this area is 22,407,815 Swiss francs, and the personnel consists of 130 expatriates and 90 locally-hired staff. The personnel numbers and budget have continued to increase dramatically since the Annual Report 2001.

    When I checked the ICRC worldwide web page on February 19-21, 2003, they listed a presence of 327 (254 staff, including 73 expatriates).

    In the recently published Annual Report 2002, the ICRC proudly states that it has doubled its personnel to cope with the severe problems caused by "the current Palestinian insurgency against occupation," and posts a dramatic budget increase to SF 53,322,637.

    These are the allocations for a human rights trouble-spot of less than 9.5 million people and covering an area of 28,285 square kilometers.

    The ICRC, which was shamelessly "neutral" and silent when it came to the Nazi extermination camps during World War II, is anything but neutral when it comes to its disproportionate focus on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    The overwhelming majority of the ICRC's largesse is concentrated on the Palestinian population (3.5 million) in the West Bank and Gaza (a total of 6,220 square kilometers). The facts speak for themselves.

    Like so many other humanitarian and human rights organizations, as well as the international media, the ICRC has far more of its limited resources concentrated in this very tiny area than it has almost anywhere else.

    THE ICRC and the other humanitarian and human rights organizations are entitled to spend their money and allocate their resources however they wish. Their commitment to providing for the needs of Palestinian Arabs is commendable. One can argue that it actually helps Israel because if the Red Cross were not providing for the Palestinians, Israel would be responsible for doing so.

    However, as is the case with UNRWA, the ICRC's largesse helps sustain and perpetuate an irresponsible Palestinian leadership and prevents the compromises required for solving the conflict peacefully. It enables the Palestinian leadership to divert its money to corruption and terrorism, and also helps support one of the most dramatic population growth rates in the history of the world.

    For my money, I would rather see a worldwide campaign to eliminate slavery, genocide, routine torture of prisoners, oppression of women, and corrupt legal systems. The scale and scope of these atrocities - all too common in East Asia, North Africa and the Islamic world - and the pain and suffering they cause cannot be underestimated.

    It is tragic that the self-inflicted "plight of the Palestinians" has dominated the agenda of the international community and diverted our attention from the countless innocent victims of human rights violations elsewhere in the Middle East and the world.

    The writer is professor of philosophy at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington.

  7. #7
    chrisjohn316
    Guest

    Re: The International Red Cross condemns the security fence

    Originally posted by Oh Jerusalem
    [i]Red Cross Breaks Silence on Israel Barrier
    2 hours, 57 minutes ago

    By ALEXANDER G. HIGGINS, Associated Press Writer

    GENEVA - The International Red Cross on Wednesday broke its silence on the West Bank barrier being built by Israel, expressing "serious concern" that it illegally cuts Palestinians off from their own land.

    I support the Red Cross but they should keep their mouths shut on this. They have no right to comment about the fence. It kills no one and only saves lives.

    The Red Cross should not get involved in politics. They should concentrate on humanitarian work.

    The Red Cross are speaking about something they have no right to, unless they want to become politcial.

  8. #8
    chrisjohn316
    Guest

    Re: The International Red Cross condemns the security fence

    Originally posted by Oh Jerusalem
    [i]Red Cross Breaks Silence on Israel Barrier
    2 hours, 57 minutes ago

    By ALEXANDER G. HIGGINS, Associated Press Writer

    “If we’re going to have the Shield of David, why would we not have to accept the swastika?" --- ICRC former president Cornelio Sommaruga

    More on the ICRC and it's hsitory of anti-semitism can be found here, amongst many other places.

    Have a humanitarian organisation that wore a swastika armband? What is this, a Mel Brooks send up?



    I can just see it now. Blood donors strapped to chairs.

    "Hullo ich bin Adolf und for today I vil be ze doktor und you vil obey, jawohl!"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 28
    Last Post: 08-01-2002, 09:15 AM
  2. The Trouble with International Courts
    By NewsGuy in forum Tackling Anti-Semitism
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 05-24-2002, 08:32 PM
  3. international solution
    By takeo in forum In The News
    Replies: 107
    Last Post: 05-09-2002, 08:17 PM
  4. Oslo II and the end of 242
    By L@mplighterM in forum Israeli-Arab Conflict
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-09-2002, 09:34 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •