Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: WMD, R.I.P; Everyone NOW agrees Israel's Pre-emptive Osirak hit was Right

  1. #1
    abu afak
    Guest

    WMD, R.I.P; Everyone NOW agrees Israel's Pre-emptive Osirak hit was Right

    WMD, R.I.P.
    Everyone now agrees it was right to attack Iraq pre-emptively.


    BY L. GORDON CROVITZ
    Tuesday, June 1, 2004

    A familiar news story: A hard-line government uses its powerful military to launch a unilateral pre-emptive strike. The United Nations and Europe are horrified, along with most of the American media. They condemn the strike and brush off claims that it was justified as an act of self-defense against an unpredictable tyrant.

    So was it a terrible mistake, a lamentable error of judgment? Not at all. History now smiles on Israel's elimination of Saddam's nearly completed weapon of mass destruction more than 20 years ago.

    In June 1981, eight Israeli jets flew at 100 feet across Jordan and Saudi Arabia, evading detection to destroy the French nuclear reactor at Osirak, just outside Baghdad. The raid followed years of failed diplomacy: Saddam's French, German and Belgian suppliers had refused to let anything disrupt their lucrative role in his oil-for-nukes program.

    Until now, no one had told the full story of the extraordinary planning required for the raid and the derring-do of the pilots, who had calculated that there was a one-in-four chance of being shot out of the sky before reaching the target. Rodger Claire, a former magazine editor, has gained access to Israeli military records and to the pilots who handled the mission. In "Raid on the Sun," he evokes the rigors and the risks of the plan.

    Prime Minister Menachem Begin and his Likud allies, such as Ariel Sharon, had to stiffen the spines of Labor Party and intelligence officials who feared the repercussions of such a raid. "If I have a choice of being popular and dead or unpopular and alive," Mr. Sharon told fellow cabinet members, "I choose being alive and unpopular."

    The 600-mile trip to the facility went well beyond the design specs of Israel's U.S.-built F-16 Fighting Falcons, which carried special 2,000-pound bombs and jury-rigged external fuel tanks. The book focuses on Gen. David Ivry, commander of the Israeli Air Force, and on the eight mission pilots. These included Ilan Ramon, who would later die in the Columbia space-shuttle explosion. Mr. Claire introduces us to each of the pilots--which ones told their wives of the dangers, which ones developed superstitions about their aircraft and, yes, which one blacked out and missed his target. Mr. Claire describes the brutal sun and desert heat that made a dangerous mission also physically punishing. A movie-maker unafraid of political correctness--the Israeli military as heroic!--could build a blockbuster around this story.

    World opinion was all but unanimous in its outrage, and American opinion too. The New York Times editorialized that "Israel's sneak attack on a French-built nuclear reactor near Baghdad was an act of inexcusable and short-sighted aggression." Time magazine fretted that "Israel has vastly compounded the difficulties of procuring a peaceful settlement of the confrontation in the Middle East." The U.S. secretary of state called the raid "reckless." The U.S. ambassador to the U.N. said it was "shocking" and approved a U.N. resolution demanding that Israel make "appropriate redress" to Iraq.

    This was during the first few months of the Reagan administration, so the secretary of state was Alexander Haig and the U.N. ambassador Jeanne Kirkpatrick. Caspar Weinberger, the defense secretary, feared the reaction in Arab capitals and suspended further sales of F-16s to Israel. If the administration's official reaction was to condemn, the president's private reaction was to admire: "What a terrific piece of bombing," Mr. Reagan said upon seeing photos of the reactor site.

    There was at least one exception to the media's chorus of denunciation. Under the headline "Mourning the Bomb," The Wall Street Journal's lead editorial began: "An atom bomb for Iraq, we have learned in the past 24 hours, has become the latest great cause celebre of world opiniondom. Various governments, including our own, and a lot of pundits have been busily condemning Israel's raid on Iraq's nuclear reactor. Our own reaction is that it's nice to know that in Israel we have at least one nation left that still lives in the world of reality." The editorial added: "Of course Iraq was building a bomb," and "of course, given the Iraqi reputation for political nuttiness reaffirmed again in its starting a war with Iran, its atom bomb would also have been a danger to all its neighbors. We all ought to get together and send the Israelis a vote of thanks."


    Israel sought security, not world gratitude, a realism that the U.S. perhaps should recall as we endure current carping. If even the Reagan administration at first condemned the action, we probably shouldn't be surprised by today's hand-wringing over the U.S. handling of Saddam, Iraq and the Bush doctrine of pre-emption.

    In time, condemnation of Israel became gratitude. As Mr. Claire recalls at the conclusion of his book, Gen. Ivry a decade later received a satellite photo taken by the U.S. after the raid, showing its devastating effect. There was a handwritten note at the bottom, written just after the U.S. liberation of Kuwait in 1991. "With thanks and appreciation. You made our job easier in Desert Storm.--Dick Cheney."

    http://www.opinionjournal.com/la/?id=110005149

    Mr. Crovitz is senior vice president of Dow Jones & Co., which publishes The Wall Street Journal. You can buy "Raid on the Sun" from the OpinionJournal bookstore.

  2. #2
    TDidier
    Guest

    Re: WMD, R.I.P; Everyone NOW agrees Israel's Pre-emptive Osirak hit was Right

    When do Israel strike the Dimona reactor?

    All the sign of the devil are inside: build by french !

    The difference between Osirak and Dimona was that France accepted to extend Dimona capacity far higher than electrical needs for Israel, it was the first step for Israel nuclear "dissuasion" and France participated actively...

    But for Osirak, no extension over simple electric production, then no direct way to nuclear weapons...



    Originally posted by abu afak
    WMD, R.I.P.
    Everyone now agrees it was right to attack Iraq pre-emptively.


    BY L. GORDON CROVITZ
    Tuesday, June 1, 2004

    A familiar news story: A hard-line government uses its powerful military to launch a unilateral pre-emptive strike. The United Nations and Europe are horrified, along with most of the American media. They condemn the strike and brush off claims that it was justified as an act of self-defense against an unpredictable tyrant.

    So was it a terrible mistake, a lamentable error of judgment? Not at all. History now smiles on Israel's elimination of Saddam's nearly completed weapon of mass destruction more than 20 years ago.

    In June 1981, eight Israeli jets flew at 100 feet [...]
    the U.S. liberation of Kuwait in 1991. "With thanks and appreciation. You made our job easier in Desert Storm.--Dick Cheney."

    http://www.opinionjournal.com/la/?id=110005149

    Mr. Crovitz is senior vice president of Dow Jones & Co., which publishes The Wall Street Journal. You can buy "Raid on the Sun" from the OpinionJournal bookstore.

  3. #3
    David_in_NYC
    Guest

    Re: Re: WMD, R.I.P; Everyone NOW agrees Israel's Pre-emptive Osirak hit was Right

    Originally posted by TDidier
    When do Israel strike the Dimona reactor?

    All the sign of the devil are inside: build by french !

    The difference between Osirak and Dimona was that France accepted to extend Dimona capacity far higher than electrical needs for Israel, it was the first step for Israel nuclear "dissuasion" and France participated actively...

    But for Osirak, no extension over simple electric production, then no direct way to nuclear weapons...

    The difference is that Israel had the ability to build a reactor on its own, while Iraq did not. Also, that Israel could be trusted not to use nukes except as an absolute last resort for survival, while Iraq could be expected to launch one (at Israel) as soon as it was able.

  4. #4
    Mira~
    Guest

    Re: Re: WMD, R.I.P; Everyone NOW agrees Israel's Pre-emptive Osirak hit was Right

    Originally posted by TDidier
    When do Israel strike the Dimona reactor?

    All the sign of the devil are inside: build by french !

    The difference between Osirak and Dimona was that France accepted to extend Dimona capacity far higher than electrical needs for Israel, it was the first step for Israel nuclear "dissuasion" and France participated actively...

    But for Osirak, no extension over simple electric production, then no direct way to nuclear weapons...


    Signs of advanced program in Iran
    IAEA's inspections also uncover traces of arms-grade uranium
    By Douglas Frantz, Los Angeles Times | June 2, 2004

    WASHINGTON -- International inspectors have found new evidence that Iran engaged in a more ambitious program than it had admitted to develop advanced machines for producing material that could be used in nuclear weapons, according to a report obtainedyesterday.

    Discoveries by the International Atomic Energy Agency contradicted previous contentions by Iran that its scientists had made little attempt to manufacture sophisticated Pakistani-designed P-2 centrifuges.

    IAEA inspectors also found traces of weapons-grade uranium that indicated Iran either imported nuclear-related components from a country other than Pakistan or has made more progress than previously known in developing its own ability to produce material capable of being used in nuclear weapons.

    The latest in a yearlong series of critical reports on Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA said serious questions remained about the scope and intentions of Tehran's atomic activities, but it did not say evidence of a weapons program had been found.

    Still, the findings seemed to ensure that pressure on Iran would not be eased later this month at the agency's board meeting in Vienna. The report was prepared for the June 14 board meeting, and a copy was provided to the Los Angeles Times by a Western diplomat.

    Washington has argued that Tehran is pursuing a nuclear weapons program behind the faade of a civilian effort. Iranian officials have said repeatedly that the program is purely to generate electricity.

    At a meeting of parliament members from NATO countries in Bratislava, Slovakia, IAEA director Mohammed ElBaradei said it was not clear whether Iran's program was exclusively for peaceful purposes or had a military dimension.

    "We haven't seen concrete proof of a military program, so it's premature to make a judgment on that," he said, according to the Reuters news agency.

    The report was worded carefully to try to keep the negotiations open with Tehran. The IAEA praised Tehran's cooperation, but also said Iran had continued to change its story on key issues and to withhold information.

    Jon B. Wolfsthal, a nonproliferation specialist at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, in Washington, said that after reviewing the report, it did not answer the question of Tehran's ultimate nuclear intentions. "It's clear from this report that we have not gotten a clear picture of Iran's program," Wolfsthal said. "There are still major gaps."

    The IAEA report focused a particularly harsh light on Iran's efforts to develop the sophisticated P-2 centrifuges from designs and components purchased from the black-market network run by Pakistani scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan.

    "Important information about the P-2 centrifuge program has frequently required repeated requests and in some cases continues to involve changing or contradictory information," the report said.

    Iran said it inadvertently left the P-2 plans out of its disclosures to the IAEA because they constituted a small program.

    http://www.boston.com/news/world/art...ogram_in_iran/

  5. #5
    golani
    Guest

    Re: Re: WMD, R.I.P; Everyone NOW agrees Israel's Pre-emptive Osirak hit was Right

    Originally posted by TDidier
    When do Israel strike the Dimona reactor?

    All the sign of the devil are inside: build by french !

    The difference between Osirak and Dimona was that France accepted to extend Dimona capacity far higher than electrical needs for Israel, it was the first step for Israel nuclear "dissuasion" and France participated actively...

    But for Osirak, no extension over simple electric production, then no direct way to nuclear weapons...

    FRENCH GOVERNMENT KNEW THE PURPOSE OF OSIRAK:
    BUILDING A NUCLEAR BOMB

    DO NOT PRETEND IT WAS FOR INTENDED TO SUPPLY ELECTRICITY TO IRAK POWER GRID,IT WOULD BE STUPID...

    MENAHEM BEGIN (TO ME, ISRAEL GREATEST LEADER))TOOK THE RIGHT DECISION TO DESTROY IT

    CONCERNING IRAN REACTOR,I DO HOPE THAT BOTH SHARON AND BUSH WILL BE ABLE TO ACT THE SAME WAY FOR THE SAFETY OF THE FREE WORLD

    AM ISRAEL HAI

    FROM BRUSSELS, CAPITAL OF THE NEXT CALIPHATE OF EUROPE

  6. #6
    Oh Jerusalem
    Guest

    Re: Re: WMD, R.I.P; Everyone NOW agrees Israel's Pre-emptive Osirak hit was Right

    Originally posted by TDidier
    All the sign of the devil are inside: build by french !
    I know of one country that has about 60 French reactors. They must be asking for it!

  7. #7
    TDidier
    Guest

    Re: Re: Re: WMD, R.I.P; Everyone NOW agrees Israel's Pre-emptive Osirak hit was Right

    Originally posted by David_in_NYC
    The difference is that Israel had the ability to build a reactor on its own, while Iraq did not. Also, that Israel could be trusted not to use nukes except as an absolute last resort for survival, while Iraq could be expected to launch one (at Israel) as soon as it was able.
    ?

  8. #8
    Oh Jerusalem
    Guest

    Re: Re: Re: WMD, R.I.P; Everyone NOW agrees Israel's Pre-emptive Osirak hit was Right

    Originally posted by golani
    CONCERNING IRAN REACTOR,I DO HOPE THAT BOTH SHARON AND BUSH WILL BE ABLE TO ACT THE SAME WAY FOR THE SAFETY OF THE FREE WORLD
    Nobody is doing anything right when it comes to the Iranians.

    Iran Says Its Nuclear Case Nearly Closed
    Wed Jun 2, 2004 07:18 AM ET

    By Paul Hughes
    TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran's chief nuclear negotiator said on Wednesday the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog will soon be able to reassure the world that Tehran has no atomic arms ambitions.

    Addressing a news conference the day after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) released a report on Iran's nuclear activities, Supreme National Security Council secretary-general Hassan Rohani said only minor issues remained outstanding.

    "This report shows that Iran's nuclear case is approaching the end and there are no more important issues," he said.

    IAEA Chief Mohamed ElBaradei on Tuesday said "the jury is out" on whether Iran's atomic program was entirely peaceful.

    Rohani said the IAEA had outstanding concerns about Iran's development of sophisticated P2 uranium centrifuges capable of producing bomb-grade material and about the discovery of highly enriched uranium traces at several facilities in Iran.

    But he said both issues would soon be resolved through further investigations and inspections by the IAEA.

    "We believe that, as we said from the beginning, as the investigations continue our claim that we have only peaceful activities will become clear to the world," he said.



    Now connect the dots:

    Iran says it's building radar-evading missile; details not disclosed
    01:11 PM EDT Jun 02
    TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - Iran is producing its first stealth missile, a rocket that can evade electronic detection, the Iranian Defence Ministry said Tuesday.

    The missile, named Kowsar after a river in paradise, will be capable of hitting ships and aircraft, Defence Ministry spokesman Mohammad Reza Imani told The Associated Press. He refused to give the missile's range or provide other details. Features of the Kowsar, such as its guidance and positioning systems, are currently on show at an exhibition in Tehran that is open only to select government officials.

    Iranian state television announced the Kowsar on Tuesday while screening pictures of a missile flying through the air.

    Iran manufactures various missiles, chief among them the Shahab-3 whose range of 1,300 kilometres makes it capable of reaching Israel.

    Iran also produces tanks, armoured personnel carriers, and a fighter plane.

    The Kowsar River is mentioned in the Qur'an, Islam's holy book.

    In February, Iran's defence minister announced a production line of the Kowsar missile had been opened, but did not mention any stealth capabilities, according to an English translation of a Iranian news report that was provided to The Associated Press.

    The Feb. 16 report, on Iran's Network 1, quoted Defence Minister Ali Shamkhani as saying the new missile was a short-range naval missile designed to be fired from speedboats, helicopters or coastal launchers. The report says the missile uses an image system to lock on to targets, according to the translation.

  9. #9
    TDidier
    Guest

    Re: Re: Re: WMD, R.I.P; Everyone NOW agrees Israel's Pre-emptive Osirak hit was Right

    Originally posted by golani
    FRENCH GOVERNMENT KNEW THE PURPOSE OF OSIRAK:
    BUILDING A NUCLEAR BOMB

    DO NOT PRETEND IT WAS FOR INTENDED TO SUPPLY ELECTRICITY TO IRAK POWER GRID,IT WOULD BE STUPID...

    MENAHEM BEGIN (TO ME, ISRAEL GREATEST LEADER))TOOK THE RIGHT DECISION TO DESTROY IT

    CONCERNING IRAN REACTOR,I DO HOPE THAT BOTH SHARON AND BUSH WILL BE ABLE TO ACT THE SAME WAY FOR THE SAFETY OF THE FREE WORLD

    AM ISRAEL HAI

    FROM BRUSSELS, CAPITAL OF THE NEXT CALIPHATE OF EUROPE

    When we heard so stupids lies for justification of Iraq invasion last year and the pitties try to hide the reality (pittyfull when we know now all it really happend and the falsifications that US administration and neo-cons [ neo or old, a con is a con]):
    WHO TO TRUST ?

    The fact is that is that Osirak was not an open gate to nuclear weapons but Dimona was...

    I repeate:
    The fact is that is that Osirak was not an open gate to nuclear weapons but Dimona was...

    , I'm waiting for usual french bashing that France drop Israel, try to destroy it, etc... The reality is completly different...

  10. #10
    Oh Jerusalem
    Guest

    Re: Re: Re: Re: WMD, R.I.P; Everyone NOW agrees Israel's Pre-emptive Osirak hit was Right

    Originally posted by TDidier
    [B]I repeate:
    The fact is that is that Osirak was not an open gate to nuclear weapons but Dimona was...
    The fact is that you're 50% wrong.

  11. #11
    Oh Jerusalem
    Guest

    Re: Re: Re: Re: WMD, R.I.P; Everyone NOW agrees Israel's Pre-emptive Osirak hit was Right

    Originally posted by TDidier
    The fact is that is that Osirak was not an open gate to nuclear weapons but Dimona was...
    You know, it amazes me what historic stench French society feeds its citizens. You should get out of the box for a breather.

  12. #12
    TDidier
    Guest

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WMD, R.I.P; Everyone NOW agrees Israel's Pre-emptive Osirak hit was Right

    Originally posted by Oh Jerusalem
    You know, it amazes me what historic stench French society feeds its citizens. You should get out of the box for a breather.
    OJ, I'm sorry if so many posters here are not able to do connexion between such simple facts as that:

    Dimona was a nuke plant built by France in Israel, with extended capacity to be able to build a militar nuke program...
    Osirak was a nuke plant with minimal capacity that allow only production of electricity and minimum of nuke waste production (and only waste enter in nuke militar program, it need many operation and hard to found material more... The way is long)...

    Then what are you able to understand to that?

    I gess it is: ugly, ugly, ugly french ! ! !
    Please just use logic and smartness, forget please the racist propaganda you heard all the time: arabs are untermenshen, french are treator and want our death...etc...
    Ridiculous and ... Pity.

    The fact is that France never drop Israel, only Israel spit on France's face...

  13. #13
    Oh Jerusalem
    Guest

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WMD, R.I.P; Everyone NOW agrees Israel's Pre-emptive Osirak hit was Right

    Originally posted by TDidier
    OJ, I'm sorry if so many posters here are not able to do connexion between such simple facts as that:

    Dimona was a nuke plant built by France in Israel, with extended capacity to be able to build a militar nuke program...
    That's the 50% that's correct.
    Osirak was a nuke plant with minimal capacity that allow only production of electricity and minimum of nuke waste production (and only waste enter in nuke militar program, it need many operation and hard to found material more... The way is long)...
    That is the 50% that's incorrect. I don't know how old you are but anyone around at the time, whether in the western or the Arab world, then knew what the Iraqis had in mind.

    Here - learn a little something.
    Then what are you able to understand to that?
    That in France, the government will tell you anything to wipe their hands clean.
    I gess it is: ugly, ugly, ugly french ! ! !
    At least, you got that right. You're getting better!
    Please just use logic and smartness
    I just did.
    forget please the racist propaganda you heard all the time: arabs are untermenshen, french are treator and want our death...etc...
    Ridiculous and ... Pity.
    The fact is that France never drop Israel, only Israel spit on France's face... [/B]
    A Protestant Clergyman Answers General de Gaulle

    It is considered decent to be ecstatic over the brilliant style of your press conference. I did read your recent and original interpretation of Jewish history and you will allow me to be ecstatic not over your style, but over the surprising ignorance it reveals of the actual facts, the deliberate determination to misrepresent History and the remarkable subtlety employed in order to insult and to hurt.

    Obviously, in spite of some Israeli and Jewish exegetes, you are not anti-Semitic. It certainly would appear most ungentlemanly to be anti-Semitic as far as you are concerned, for many reasons:

    When you make of so many centuries of sufferings a simple poetic ballad of the "Wandering Jew", you insult eighteen centuries of Jewish sufferings in Christian lands.

    When you assert that in Christendom a "capital interest and sympathy" has always been offered to Israel, you insult the people to whom were inflicted the "rouelle" (round cloth headpiece Jews had to wear during the Middle Ages) and official contempt (counciliar decisions of 1215).

    When you speak of the Jewish Jerusalem as of a "conquered district" you have us smile: everybody knows in the West that this town Jerusalem covers several hills and has been built by Jewish hands. But one will have, one of these days, to realise somehow the Ambassador of France will have his place in Jerusalem, that the Holy Land is not protected anymore by anyone: Israel is in charge and takes care of it with more efficiency, courage and honour than any previous "protector".

    Really, it was not necessary, indeed to spit in the face of the people who gave the world Moses, Isaiah, Jesus, accusing Israel of provoking "the stream of malevolences: (admirable euphemisms) which Jews had to suffer unceasingly.

    Mr President, you should not have taken men of France, Western countries and Israel, for a bunch of fools since it is plain for all to see that in your mind, the important questions are about oil, money and the prestige not of France which your unworthy words have injured, but by the miserable ephemeral glory of a politician in the evening of his life.

    Claude Duvemoy
    Minister



    And with this I bid you bonsoir.

  14. #14
    TDidier
    Guest

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WMD, R.I.P; Everyone NOW agrees Israel's Pre-emptive Osirak hit was Righ

    Originally posted by Oh Jerusalem
    That is the 50% that's incorrect. I don't know how old you are but anyone around at the time, whether in the western or the Arab world, then knew what the Iraqis had in mind.

    ? Of course SHussein had nuke in mind, but with Osirak: impossible easily... Not enougth waste.
    The difference is great between a reactor build to produce a nuke program (Dimona) and a reactor build to produce electricity (Osirak).

    Here - learn a little something.

    ? And... Nothing in you link.


    That in France, the government will tell you anything to wipe their hands clean.

    Nobody in France trust that the government as completly hands clean in all what he do, we are not so stupid as some others...

    But where is the point about Dimona/Osirak differences?
    It is simple:
    Dimona: reactor for militar applications.
    Osirak: electricity...
    Please explain me what you understand when I write that (it will help me to understand your obstination to not look on reality and basic facts)



    [i]A Protestant Clergyman Answers General de Gaulle


    And ? DeGaule make probably mistake, but perfectly analyse the situation: messianic derive of Israel state, dangerous for ME, but dangerous for Israel too... And all what we know of Israel development since 1967 gove right to DeGaule.

    But ultra-nationnalists/ultra-religious response to that:

    Ugly french, ugly french,...

    Sorry, but that is ridiculous and you persuade nobody but only those who want to be persuaded...

    The fact is that France gove nuke to Israel to protect himself and Israel spit at France's face.

  15. #15
    Oh Jerusalem
    Guest

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: WMD, R.I.P; Everyone NOW agrees Israel's Pre-emptive Osirak hit was

    Originally posted by TDidier
    ? And... Nothing in you link.
    I'm sorry. A braille version is currently unavailable.
    But where is the point about Dimona/Osirak differences?
    It is simple:
    Dimona: reactor for militar applications.
    Osirak: electricity...
    Please explain me what you understand when I write that (it will help me to understand your obstination to not look on reality and basic facts)
    If anybody else wants to point out to TDidier excerpts from the article regarding Osirak's weapons potential, go right ahead and butt in.
    And ? DeGaule make probably mistake, but perfectly analyse the situation: messianic derive of Israel state, dangerous for ME, but dangerous for Israel too... And all what we know of Israel development since 1967 gove right to DeGaule.
    Messianic? Please show me who in the Israeli government, in a position of leadership, was unsecular enough to talk about Jewish messianism.

    I see you're as bigotted as De Gaulle himself was. Thanks for the candidness.
    But ultra-nationnalists/ultra-religious response to that:

    Ugly french, ugly french,...
    Look who's talking about ultra-nationalism!

    There are enough Jewish and Israeli agnostics, secularists and leftists on this forum who are nodding their head in agreement. Your posts only help to confirm it.
    The fact is that France gove nuke to Israel to protect himself and Israel spit at France's face.
    [/B]
    Who spit in whose face?

    Nuclear cooperation with Israel began under the socialist governments of Guy Mollet and Bourges-Maunory (who signed a vitally important contract just before his government fell), and continued into de Gaulle's time. These were critical days for the project. French companies built the bulk of the nuclear reactor in Dimona, and Israeli teams learned the ropes at nuclear laboratories in France. As involvement in the Algerian war lessened, however, the de Gaulle administration informed Israel (in May 1960) that assistance to Dimona would be halted. Financial compensation was offered instead.

    Ben- Gurion felt a crisis brewing and flew to France in the hopes of changing de Gaulle's mind, but in vain. In the end, the bureaucrats saved the day. Negotiations over compensation dragged on for months, and French officials, who were used to saying one thing and doing another, never told the French company commissioned to build the reactor to stop work. In the meantime, Israel managed to purchase from it all the plans and equipment.

    - Blast, from the past to the present, a book review of "Israel and the Bomb" by Avner Cohen, Columbia University Press

    As an aside, here's an interesting and very detailed historical perspective of Israel and Algeria amid French Colonialism and the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1954–1978.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The worst danger in Israel's history
    By NewsGuy in forum Israeli Politics
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 08-20-2008, 01:52 AM
  2. Replies: 257
    Last Post: 08-28-2006, 08:18 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •