Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Islamist influenced Girl banned from wearing Islamic dress in school

  1. #1
    Isiah 2:4
    Guest

    Islamist influenced Girl banned from wearing Islamic dress in school

    Revealed: radicals who backed girl in dress fight

    Nicholas Hellen, Social Affairs Editor


    THE teenage girl who fought a two-year legal battle to wear full Islamic dress to school was influenced by an extremist Muslim splinter group.
    Hizb ut-Tahrir (HuT), which is legal in Britain but banned in Germany and much of the Middle East , advised Shabina Begum, a 15-year-old orphan. Her case, which was funded by legal aid, was thrown out by the High Court last week.

    Mainstream Muslim leaders reacted angrily to news of extremist involvement in the case. They fear it risks stirring up the sort of controversy sparked in France when the government banned the wearing of the hijab, or headscarf, in school.

    Khalid Mahmood, Labour MP for Birmingham’s Perry Bar constituency, said: “Most Muslims are happy with the existing dress code. I think they (HuT) are trying to pick a fight. The Home Office needs to look at some of their activities. At the moment they are very close to the edge.”

    Mahmood said HuT’s role was particularly disturbing because of Begum’s vulnerability. She was 13 when, in September 2002, she was sent home from Denbigh high school in Luton for wearing a jilbab, an ankle-length dress that leaves only the face and hands visible.

    Begum, who was regarded as a promising pupil, was orphaned last April with the death of her mother. Her father had died in 1992. Her 21-year-old brother, Shuweb Rahman, who helped her bring the case, is an HuT supporter.

    Although she still intends to sit seven GCSEs next year, she has not attended any classes for almost two years. Her teachers have sent her schoolwork and have taught her outside school hours on a small number of occasions.

    Dr Imran Waheed, an HuT spokesman, confirmed that leading activists had encouraged Begum in the dispute. “Our members in Luton have consistently advised Shabina and her family to stand up for her right to an education and her right to observe the Islamic ordinances, including the wearing of the jilbab,” he said in a statement.

    He emphasised that the group had not contributed financially towards the legal action or to her family.

    According to Dr Nazreen Nawaz, also an HuT spokesman, one of the group’s supporters, Rebekha Khan, 23, has been in contact with Begum for the past two years. This weekend, Khan played down her role: “The first time I met Shabina was at an Islamic event two years ago. It was clear to me even then that she was already very orientated to Islam.”

    Mahmood, who has in the past likened HuT to the British National party, said it had a record of targeting young people in schools and universities to lure them away from the mainstream of the Muslim community in Britain. “It is important that social services look into that role,” he said.

    Denbigh High school was an unlikely target for criticism. Almost 80% of its 1,000 pupils are Muslim, and its dress code, which allows pupils to wear a shalwar kameez (trousers and a long tunic), was introduced with the support of the town’s Council of Mosques.

    The school argued that going further, by permitting the jilbab, might create divisions by implying that those who did not wear it were not as devout as those who did. It also suggested that the garment posed a safety hazard.

    Earlier this year, another Luton school, Icknield High, was targeted by extremists after the head teacher, Keith Ford, insisted that Muslim girls should not wear hijabs. Ford took early retirement, although insisted he would not be forced to “retire over a matter of a piece of cloth”.

    According to Geoff Lambert, then chairman of the board of governors, the picket by the radical Muslim group al-Muhajiroun was counterproductive. He said the governors had already decided on legal advice in January that they had to permit the wearing of the hijab.

    The announcement of the decision was delayed until March because the governors were concerned that they should not be seen to bow to pressure. Al-Muhajiroun is headed by the Syrian-born radical Sheikh Omar Bakri, who led a breakaway from the London branch of HuT.

    HuT’s ultimate aim is a worldwide Muslim state, ruled by sharia, Islamic law, and it urges Muslims not to participate in democratic politics. It was founded in 1953 in the Middle East, and was banned in Egypt after an attempted coup in 1974. It has sent a delegation to President Jacques Chirac urging him to reconsider the French ban on the wearing of the hijab.

    Yvonne Spencer, Begum’s solicitor advocate, said she had no knowledge of HuT’s influence on the schoolgirl and insisted that she had tried to resolve the dispute rather than take the case to court.

    Spencer blamed Luton borough council for failing to agree to mediation and for failing to assist Begum’s application to join other schools in the area. She said Begum and her family had decided not to take the legal battle to appeal.
    Sunday Times

    Can't believe the British government are letting HUT filth poison peoples minds in this country. Well actually i can, they didnt arrest Abu Hamza for four years even though they knew what he says and does. The fear that there would be a Muslim backlash is so great. How pathetic.

  2. #2
    Isiah 2:4
    Guest
    From the same paper and same issue;

    As a Muslim, I say no to the cover-up

    Mona Bauwens is delighted that the judge last week threw out the case brought by Shabina Begum, who wanted to wear the jilbab to schoo

    I am delighted that the Muslim schoolgirl Shabina Begum has lost her battle to wear the jilbab to school. As an Arab Muslim woman brought up in this country, I was angry that Shabina demanded to wear the strict head-to-toe gown to school because wearing the school’s uniform was “eroding her human rights”. To me, her demand was a flagrant abuse of the human rights this country has given her, and I feel strongly that Shabina should show more respect for life in Britain.

    Shabina is a British subject. This is where her parents brought her from Bangladesh and where she gets all the benefits of being a British national; the NHS, education, sexual equality and so on. The school she attended for two years, Luton’s Denbigh high school, devised a dress code with local Muslim clerics that was acceptable to the majority of the students. Girls have the option of wearing trousers, skirts or a salwar kameez (trousers and tunic) with a scarf if they wish to cover their hair. The school didn’t want its pupils to wear the jilbab because it worried that those who did might be regarded as “better Muslims” and because there was a simple safety risk of tripping over it.

    Shabina, who was orphaned earlier this year following the death of her mother, wore a salwar kameez to school for two years. But, abruptly, in September 2003, she changed her mind and demanded to cover up, branding the salwar kameez “too revealing”. The school would not allow her to attend wearing a jilbab. Shabina claimed this violated her right to an education and her human right of religious expression.

    While I respect Shabina’s interpretation of Islam, I am disturbed at the attempt to link choice of dress to human rights. I am worried because there seems to be a very strong revival in traditional Muslim women’s dress in Britain. As a child growing up here, it was extremely rare to see Muslim women in this country who were fully covered up, but recently I’ve seen a huge increase in the number of women who are fully covered on any high street.

    To me, this is a direct symptom of the political repression that takes us backwards as Arabs and Muslims. What you wear does not indicate your political morality. The real reason Islamic extremists feel that women should be modest and covered up seems to be that women are becoming more educated and moving ahead of the men, and this is men’s way of controlling them.

    Shabina has to understand that in a free society a school’s rules and regulations are there for the benefit of all the students and the rules should be respected. What if the 20% of non-Muslim students in her school said they found it offensive that one of their schoolmates should wear a shroud? Or what of the other Muslim girls who may be under pressure from home to cover up more and don’t want to — what are their human rights? I fear whoever has been advising Shabina has a political agenda that would take us back to the Dark Ages.

    Part of the joy of living in England as a Muslim woman is not having to cover up in the way you have to in places such as Saudi Arabia. The matter of a dress code seems trivial but by backing Shabina’s desire to cover up completely pressure would be put on her peers to do so too. This is the thin end of the wedge. To give in on this instance would provide great credibility to the religious forces of conservatism in our society.

    I am so worried about this that I would be very reluctant to go back and live in the Middle East at the moment. Existing regimes deny the majority of Arabs any protection under the rule of law and any respect for human rights. Shabina should be grateful that the UK allows us Muslims to retain our culture, our tradition, our food — and in return we should respect our host country’s great freedoms.

    As an Arab Muslim woman who came to England as a child, there were many instances where I felt I was an outsider, an Arab thrust into an alien culture. I felt I had no identity and belonged nowhere. To Arabs I was too westernised to be normal; to my British friends, too conservative. Thanks to the liberal attitude of my host culture and learning what was appropriate in different countries I learnt to feel comfortable about myself.

    I am greatly concerned that some immigrants who have fled here for protection end up abusing the rights extended to them. Take Abu Hamza, the hook-handed cleric from Finsbury Park mosque who faces extradition to America on terrorism charges. He left Egypt because he felt persecuted there, and proceeded to abuse Britain’s freedoms of speech and association to propagate dangerous and subversive anti-western sentiment.

    I am pleased that he has now been arrested. It should have happened a long time ago; he has abused the very rights the UK extended to him. The great majority of Muslims in this country take great offence at Abu Hamza’s preachings and have no desire to see young women clad in jilbabs.

    Today, living in Britain, I feel safe. I am incredibly lucky compared with thousands of my people who live in danger in Palestine . As a result, I passionately believe in human rights, which is why I am so furious that a 15-year-old such as Shabina should confuse human rights with an issue about school uniform and play into the hands of those who would repress us.

    As a mother of a teenager I frequently have to listen to arguments from my 16-year-old daughter who believes that her school dress code is silly. Most teenagers dislike restrictions on their dress irrespective of religion or culture — I hated my ugly uniform at my boarding school, Tudor Hall. But schools have rules, let’s not confuse those with the bigger issues.

    My daughter Soraya wears clothes typical of most British teenagers: she has a bare midriff and her navel is pierced, which might horrify the more traditional members of the Islamic community. But, more importantly, I teach my daughter that what is important in life is respect and understanding.

    When she was eight I arranged special lessons with one of London’s leading Muslim clerics. After three lessons, Soraya was coming home in tears because the cleric was insisting she cover herself from head to toe — at eight! I had a huge row with this man, and told him: “I want you to teach my daughter the principles of love and compassion, which are the basic tenets of Islam, not about clothes.” Not long afterwards, this revered cleric left his wife and ran off with a Moroccan dancer. There is much hypocrisy on the subject of Islamic dress, which is often about controlling women.

    I am not anti-Islam. I am not anti what Shabina or others want to wear. But don’t go imposing it, don’t play into the hands of freedom-hating extremists. What matters, I think, is to wear something appropriate to your surroundings, a lesson I learnt early on, when aged seven I was taken to the desert wearing a tiny pair of shorts and a T-shirt. An old bedouin brought me a towel to cover my legs. I wasn’t told off: he demonstrated that what I was wearing wasn’t acceptable. Ever since, I have tried to show my respect for whatever culture I am visiting or living in by what I wear.

    Now I live in London and I more or less wear what I want, as do most women in London’s sophisticated Arab community. I love fashion and wearing designer clothes — a very short skirt, maybe, or a strapless bustier or décoletté cocktail dress — and I don’t feel disrespectful in any way to my religion. I want it to stay that way.
    She just had to put that in about kin' Palestine. What about Darfur?? Your fellow Muslims are dying there, in their thousands, What about the entire Middle East and pretty much the whole Islamic world. The human rights record is much worse there. This is the kind of off the cuff sentiment which distorts all Islamic thinking into elevating the Palestinian issue to supreme inportance, in their minds, and in the minds of others. Riduclous really.

  3. #3
    David_in_NYC
    Guest
    Has anybody noticed that the only women who wear Islamic garb are ugly as sin? No wonder people demand they cover up - they are stomach-turningly ugly. Generation upon generation of Islamic males being unable to pick the most beautiful women as wifes has managed to breed extreme dog-facedness into the gene pool.

  4. #4
    Oh Jerusalem
    Guest
    Originally posted by David_in_NYC
    Has anybody noticed that the only women who wear Islamic garb are ugly as sin?
    How can you tell?

  5. #5
    David_in_NYC
    Guest
    Originally posted by Oh Jerusalem
    How can you tell?
    Because the fashion of the Islamofascists around these parts seems to be a full-body black covering with the face visible.

  6. #6
    Isiah 2:4
    Guest
    Originally posted by David_in_NYC
    Has anybody noticed that the only women who wear Islamic garb are ugly as sin? No wonder people demand they cover up - they are stomach-turningly ugly. Generation upon generation of Islamic males being unable to pick the most beautiful women as wifes has managed to breed extreme dog-facedness into the gene pool.
    It's not true. There was a programme on the BBC a few weeks back which was about young and some quite beautiful Muslims who CHOOSE to wear the veil. They gave all sorts of stupid reasons though.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programme...ma/3782147.stm

  7. #7
    Oh Jerusalem
    Guest
    Originally posted by David_in_NYC
    Because the fashion of the Islamofascists around these parts seems to be a full-body black covering with the face visible.
    Oh. I didn't know you were referring to the lenient dress code.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Mediocrates's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    N Carolina
    Posts
    30,616
    A jibab is not a veil. It is a comprehensive shawl over the head neck and shoulders and below. You are probably thinking of a niqab (in India and Pakistan called chador).

    A hijab is typically smaller than a jibab. More like a scarf or a nun's habit.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Anti-Semitism or Criticism of Israel?
    By NewsGuy in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 137
    Last Post: 06-07-2002, 03:02 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •