Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 124

Thread: France Steps Up Its Investments in Iran

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Oh Jerusalem
    Guest

    France Steps Up Its Investments in Iran

    France Steps Up Its Investments in Iran
    By BORZOU DARAGAHI

    TEHRAN, Iran - Undeterred by Iran's pariah status in the United States and by the shortcomings of the country's commercial climate, French companies have been increasing their presence in the country in the last few years.

    New Peugeots and Citroëns flood crowded highways and streets. French business people dine in the capital's restaurants and work on Persian Gulf oil platforms. Air France resumed flights to Tehran this month after a seven-year hiatus. And the carmaker Renault is about to make the first large-scale, long-term direct investment in the country by a French company since the 1979 revolution that toppled the pro-American Shah Reza Pahlavi.

    "The French are eager to come to Iran," said Bernard Hourcade, a Paris-based Iran scholar who acts as a consultant to French companies considering doing business here. "It is the only major place in the Middle East to invest because the other countries are more or less in a revolutionary or prerevolutionary situation."

    Though companies from Germany and the United Arab Emirates have a bigger presence in Iran, France is catching up.

    French exports to Iran have nearly doubled in five years, totaling 2 billion euros ($2.4 billion) in 2003, according to the economic mission of the French embassy in Tehran. And the number of French-connected companies registered with the embassy - some of which are joint ventures and some representative offices - has risen from a handful several years ago to more than 40.

    Among the French exports are luxury goods, for Iran's increasingly affluent middle class. If even a fraction of Iran's 68 million people are "rather prosperous," one Western diplomat said, that could exceed the total population of all the smaller, wealthier gulf kingdoms combined.

    The Iranian business of Société Générale, one of a handful of French banks with small offices in Tehran, has grown roughly 20 percent a year in the last five years, according to Jean-Michel Meunier, the bank's Tehran chief.

    Alcatel, the French telecommunications giant, recently signed multimillion-dollar contracts to provide high-speed Internet service in Iran as well as communications for offshore oil and gas platforms.

    PSA Peugeot Citroën, under a licensing agreement, sells kits for several models, including the Peugeot 206, a sports car that has become a status symbol in Tehran's chic sections.

    The Total Group, one of the world's largest energy concerns, has long been involved in Iran, a country with 9 percent of the world's oil reserves and as much as 18 percent of its natural gas reserves. This year, it formed a $2 billion venture with the government-owned National Iranian Oil Corporation and Petronas of Malaysia called Pars LNG, which aims to produce eight million metric tons of liquefied natural gas a year, equal to about 15 percent of current world output.

    Total executives in Paris would not comment on Middle East operations. A spokeswoman said the company employed 242 people on its Iran projects.

    But Total's buyback agreements with Iran, under which it builds plants and then is paid back and sent on its way as its operations produce energy, means it never owns anything long term in Iran. Peugeot employs only 15 people to oversee the assembly of its cars by local employees of the government-owned factories. Alcatel sells and installs equipment. Société Générale's business here is also limited, consisting mostly of setting up transfers and repatriating funds.

    Far more ambitious is Renault's plan to begin making its low-budget Logan series cars here in 2006, eventually bringing hundreds of Western experts to Iran. Renault says it will initially spend 300 million euros ($363 million), and some people close to the deal say the company could lay out $700 million over the next several years. The initial outlay alone nearly equals the total foreign investment in Iran by French companies in 2002, the last year for which statistics were available from the French economics mission, up from zero in 1994.

    Under the agreement, Renault owns 51 percent of the joint venture, Renault Pars, with the Automotive Industry Development Company, a concern owned by the country's two main, government-controlled carmakers, the Saipa Group and the Iran Khodro Industrial Group.

    The car is coming on line just as the Iranians begin halting production of the clunky, fuel-guzzling Paykan, a knockoff of the 1960's British Hillman Hunter that dominates the domestic market.

    "The Renault investment will encourage other companies to come," the Western diplomat said, adding that the company would bring along many subcontractors.

    Executives for Renault, which is 15 percent owned by the French government, were not made available for comment.

    Iran is among several developing countries, including Romania, where Renault is bolstering its presence.

    "Four-fifths of the world's population don't yet have access to a car: these markets therefore have the highest potential for growth," Louis Schweitzer, Renault's chief executive, says on the company's Web site. According to Peugeot, Iran has 1 car for every 21 inhabitants, compared with 1 for every 12 in neighboring Turkey, another developing Muslim country.

    The country produced 600,000 new cars in the fiscal year that ended March 20, up from 430,000 in the previous year. This year, the country is slated to produce nearly 900,000 cars.

    Despite such potential, many Western companies doing business in Iran do so clandestinely, worried they will cross the United States, which has imposed strict sanctions on Iran since 1996. At least one major French company in Iran with significant United States operations has not registered with the French embassy. The front door to its office in Iran says simply, "French company."

    While American officials have not said anything publicly about Renault, they did complain about Total's recent deal and said they would look at possible actions under the Iran-Libya Sanctions Act of 1996.

    "We do not encourage investment in Iran's petroleum sector," said Richard A. Boucher, a State Department spokesman, according to an Associated Press report in February. "We have laws that affect our attitudes toward these investments. And we will have to look at those laws appropriately."

    State Department officials did not respond to repeated requests for comment. But trade experts said they did not think the act, which allows for the imposition of penalties on foreign companies for certain large investments in Iran, had ever been invoked.

    "As to whether the U.S. has actually sanctioned any firms for prohibited investments in Iran, there is not much of a track record,'' said Donald A. Weadon Jr., a Washington lawyer specializing in foreign trade sanctions. "But companies are investigated, and pressure is brought to deter investment."

    And, he said, other sanctions and embargos are being imposed.

    According to Mr. Hourcade, the consultant, the companies are mostly worried that they will have trouble running their businesses without access to products - like software or spare parts - made by American companies, which are barred from doing business with Iran.

    An executive of a multinational with a big United States business said his company decided to open an office here in part to keep an eye on its competitors and not be totally clueless about Iran should Washington lift sanctions.

    "So many companies are here, but they're keeping a very low profile and you can't figure out what they're doing here," he said, asking his name and his company's not be used.

    Iran's business climate also poses formidable challenges, including a byzantine regulatory system and unorthodox accounting practices that sometimes have left companies wondering whether they will be able to repatriate any profits.

    The country has worked hard to draw foreign investment, with officials vowing to remove red tape and saying that foreign investors now can establish a company in Iran and own 100 percent of it.

    Still, one person involved in the Renault Pars deal said that problems had already begun. Though the company is nominally French-controlled, he said, the Iranian manufacturers can override Renault's decisions.

    Western business leaders here also complain of a lack of demographic and marketing data. Half of the country's cars, for example, are registered in Tehran. But Peugeot - whose business in Iran is its third largest non-European operation, behind China and Brazil - found that many of those living along the cool, rainy Caspian coastline register their cars in the relatively warm, dry capital, to increase resale values.

    And though the Peugeot 206 is selling, said Jacques Manlay, the Tehran representative for Peugeot, no one is sure why and to whom. "All I know," he said, "is that it's a car for the young lady in the north of Tehran."

  2. #2
    takeo
    Guest
    good, we are helping to make Iran more affluent and westernised and making bucks at the same time, we are also stepping up our investments in Cuba.

    The US economic blackmail won't help to make Iran more moderate, rather on the contrary. This kind of policy encourages isolation, destitution, poverty and extremism, the European approach on the other hand encouurages countries to become more open, more wealthy and more business-minded, which in turn will influence political decisionmaking and general mentality as well.

  3. #3
    Olivier
    Guest
    Originally posted by takeo
    good, we are helping to make Iran more affluent and westernised and making bucks at the same time, we are also stepping up our investments in Cuba.

    The US economic blackmail won't help to make Iran more moderate, rather on the contrary. This kind of policy encourages isolation, destitution, poverty and extremism, the European approach on the other hand encouurages countries to become more open, more wealthy and more business-minded, which in turn will influence political decisionmaking and general mentality as well.
    Takeo is right. You don't get the iranian imams out of power by keeping the country in the middle ages with an embargo, even less the threat of the invasion. This way you are only boosting the imams.

    I think you didn't learn anything from iraq. You are taking the same policy. These countries must change from the inside, and the very young population of iran is asking for change.

    Embargos and Invasions are the worst #%$µ thing to do.

  4. #4
    takeo
    Guest
    exactluy, young Iranians demand changes and look to MTV, but they still hate the Us mainly because of its aggressive policy which is directed against all Iranians not only against the mulahs.

    And how much credibility can one loose condemning France because it trades in cars with Iran while your own country sold weapons to Iran when Ayatollah Khomeini was still in power and Iran was still a revolutionary center of the Islamic world...

    I also wish to take the advantage to condemn the embargo against Cuba in the strongest possible terms. US is aiding and financing dictators all over the world but Cuba is harshly embargoed because... yes why exactly? perhaps their cigars are a danger to public health?

  5. #5
    Senior Member Mediocrates's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    N Carolina
    Posts
    30,616
    You watch TV and you hate America, what's your excuse?

  6. #6
    Ahava
    Guest
    Originally posted by takeo

    I also wish to take the advantage to condemn the embargo against Cuba in the strongest possible terms.
    Save your "strongest possible terms" for terrorists.

  7. #7
    takeo
    Guest
    I don't hate the US, only the US-policy, it may sound as a cliché but it's true. And I think many people around the world think likewise, they all like holywood and "friends" and they all hate Bush and Rumsfeld, it's a phenomenon around the world from cuba over Africa and Europe to Asia...

    Save your "strongest possible terms" for terrorists.

    nope, hurting an economy and the wellbeing of a people on purpose is as bad as terrorism, actually it's economic terrorism but not less devastating for the population. and unfortunately Cuba doesn't have nukes or a large consumermarket as for example China so it's completely defenseless against so much evil force.

  8. #8
    Ahava
    Guest
    Originally posted by takeo

    nope, hurting an economy and the wellbeing of a people on purpose is as bad as terrorism, actually it's economic terrorism but not less devastating for the population. and unfortunately Cuba doesn't have nukes or a large consumermarket as for example China so it's completely defenseless against so much evil force.
    You are serious aren't you?

  9. #9
    takeo
    Guest
    yes I am, this embargo costs Cuba billions of dollars each year, which mean that standard of living remains low, what's more is that the us equally punishes foreign companies who invest in Cuba, which is clearly unacceptable and condamned even by the closest ally GB.

    terrorists kill some people and terrorise the others, while embargo's harm a majority of people by taking away their economic means, which is like slowly killing. suppose you and your family suddenly ran out of money, your entire life will change and most likely worsen a lot.

  10. #10
    Ahava
    Guest
    Originally posted by takeo
    yes I am, this embargo costs Cuba billions of dollars each year, which mean that standard of living remains low, what's more is that the us equally punishes foreign companies who invest in Cuba, which is clearly unacceptable and condamned even by the closest ally GB.
    I guess an Israel boycott would be fully justified though, according to you?

    terrorists kill some people and terrorise the others, while embargo's harm a majority of people by taking away their economic means.
    terrorists willfully blow people to pieces, their aim is to kill as much innocent people as possible. Embargos are to try to force a country to do something (or, more often, to refrain from something). There's no winning here: supporting corrupt countries makes them hypocrite and corrupt, embargo-ing them makes them terrorists. Nice logic.

    By the way I think it's unbelievably arrogant what you're saying, who do you think you are condemning America? Oh they will shiver and shudder when they heard takeo's condemnation!!

  11. #11
    Senior Member Mediocrates's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    N Carolina
    Posts
    30,616
    Originally posted by Ahava
    Save your "strongest possible terms" for terrorists.
    There are no non American terrorists, didn't you hear?

  12. #12
    Senior Member Mediocrates's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    N Carolina
    Posts
    30,616
    Originally posted by Ahava
    You are serious aren't you?
    Of course he is. Don't you read? There are no Non American (or their Jew puppets...or masters I forget which) terrorists.

  13. #13
    Ahava
    Guest
    Originally posted by Mediocrates
    There are no non American terrorists, didn't you hear?
    According to Fronce there aren't I guess. I think it's too bad how many French posters confirm the stereotype of being anti-American. Please don't think all Europeans are!

  14. #14
    Senior Member Mediocrates's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    N Carolina
    Posts
    30,616
    I think it's something in their water....

  15. #15
    Ahava
    Guest
    Originally posted by Mediocrates
    I think it's something in their water....
    That must be it! When i was in Paris the water tasted like chloor (don't know the word in English?). Here the water is ok but still I always drink bottled water. SPA!
    By the way, guess where I bought my USA- headscarf sort-of-thing? In Paris!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Hope in Iran
    By Skogan in forum Tackling Anti-Semitism
    Replies: 267
    Last Post: 06-14-2006, 04:14 AM
  2. "You [the U.S.] Will Vanish, But We Will Remain"
    By L@mplighterM in forum In The News
    Replies: 175
    Last Post: 09-03-2002, 04:01 PM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-02-2002, 10:31 PM
  4. Nearly 360 attacks against Jews in France
    By L@mplighterM in forum Tackling Anti-Semitism
    Replies: 92
    Last Post: 05-11-2002, 05:27 PM
  5. Why is the U.S. covering up for PA and Iran???
    By Negev in forum Tackling Anti-Semitism
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 01-11-2002, 12:19 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •