Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: Unfit For Command

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Elisheba
    Guest

    Exclamation Unfit For Command

    John Kerry is a liar and a fraud, unfit to be the Commander-in-Chief of the United States Armed Forces. That's not just the opinion of American conservatives: As this astonishing new book shows, most of the men who served with Kerry in Vietnam think this way. Now, in Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out against John Kerry, John O'Neill and Jerry Corsi explain why.

    O'Neil (who succeeded Kerry as commander of Swift boat PCF 94 in Vietnam and soundly defeated him in a 1971 debate about the war on the Dick Cavett Show) and Corsi lay bare in this book the hypocrisy and paradoxes of Kerry. They explain how someone who until recently claimed he was a war criminal, who threw away his medals and supported the North Vietnamese with his words while our soldiers were fighting and dying in the field, can now switch sides to run as a hero of those he condemned as criminal in that war.

    This book gives you the whole story: the truth (from trustworthy eyewitnesses) about the service in Vietnam that Kerry has consistently distorted for his own political gain; Kerry's notorious, un-American activities as head of the peacenik group Vietnam Veterans Against the War; his cynical practice of trying to appeal to both sides of the American voting public by playing up both his Vietnam service and his antiwar activities; and much, much more that establishes beyond all doubt that Kerry is truly unfit to be President, or to hold any public office.

    Unfit for Command presents crucial information that the American people should consider carefully as they decide Kerry's fitness to be Commander-in-Chief. If patriotic Americans heed the facts that O'Neill and Corsi present there, they will return this untrustworthy, self-serving political animal to private life this November. Nothing less than our survival as a nation could hand in the balance.

    Meet the real John Kerry -- as self-obsessed and ruthlessly calculating as Slick Willie.


    http://www.thbookservice.com/BookPage.asp?prod_cd=c6527

  2. #2
    Senior Member Mediocrates's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    N Carolina
    Posts
    30,616
    As opposed to what? Our Maximum Leader?

  3. #3
    Elisheba
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Mediocrates
    As opposed to what? Our Maximum Leader?
    Yes: ONLY when compared to Dubya: (here's part of an article I posted in full on another thread ...)

    Flip-flopping for the Jews



    Oy vey , as my bubby would say. A lot of Jews will vote Republican this year. Bubby's spinning in the great beyond.

    Most Jews vote Democratic, and they have for a long time. They have voted in huge majorities for Democratic nominees since FDR created the New Deal. Several Republican nominees since have only occasionally increased Jewish voting percentages. Dwight D. Eisenhower won 40 percent of the Jewish vote against Adlai Stevenson in 1956; Ronald Reagan won 39 percent against Jimmy Carter in 1980 and George H.W. Bush won 35 percent against Michael Dukakis in 1988. He slipped to 11 percent against Bill Clinton.

    Although George W. did a little better with 19 percent against Al Gore four years ago, the president should do better in November. Ed Koch, the former mayor of New York who is as partisan as a Democrat comes, is a Bush man this year.

    "I do not agree with President Bush on a single major domestic issue," he says, "but in my view those issues pale in comparison with the threat of international terrorism. The stated goal of al-Qaida and its supporters is to kill or convert every infidel, and that means Jews, Christians, Buddhists and everyone else who will not accept Islam's supremacy."

    Terrorism in the Middle East was used first against the Jews, but the suicide bombers were but a warm-up act for the terrorism against the United States on 9/11. Jews who take pride in their smarts know the stakes this time.

  4. #4
    frizzer1
    Guest

    Thumbs down

    300 million americans and the best you guys can come up with is Bush and Kerry?
    And I thought the canadian choices for prime minister were bad....oy!

  5. #5
    Elisheba
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by frizzer1
    300 million americans and the best you guys can come up with is Bush and Kerry?
    And I thought the canadian choices for prime minister were bad....oy!

    No. Clearly, that is not the best. The 2 parties have become variations on a theme.

    i wanna new party

  6. #6
    philingraham
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by frizzer1
    300 million americans and the best you guys can come up with is Bush and Kerry?
    And I thought the canadian choices for prime minister were bad....oy!
    I agree, It's pathetic...

  7. #7
    Elisheba
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by philingraham
    I agree, It's pathetic...
    So, are ya gonna vote?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •