AT LAST Straight talk from kerry

Emunah · 10-26-2004, 11:51 AM

[QUOTE=minusthejihad]There should be some riots in Pennsylvania if Kerry loses, at least that's what Edwards gigantic wife thinks.[QUOTE]

There ya go winning over the women voters eh? She's got more common sense in her fat tukus then most have in their skinny little brains and I promise you that falling on a skinny arse hurts a lot more too. What do you do for fun... imitate Andrew Dice Clay on weekends too ya putz

Luv ya anyway!

I Agree with you about the Liberal morons, but can't agree with ya about Ms Edwards or Kerry. Kerry is just going to be the better of the two choices all around. I'm really looking forward to the Lib's and the AmCon jerks having to blame someone besides the "neo-cons" for everything. I think it will help people to realize that the terrorists aren't about Bush, they won't go away, and it's everyone's problem, not just Bush and the "neo-cons" fault. They must be killed/arrested/eliminated (who cares) no matter who is president. I can't wait to figure out how the lefties are going to switch from being anti-everything to pro-everything when Kerry takes office. I guess they will do what the Rep's do, continue to blame the previous administration for everything. Still, gotta go with Kerry and brains over Bush and Bush**T.

Canajew · 10-26-2004, 12:06 PM

Originally Posted by Emunah

The forum won't allow me to use enough emoticons to express the length and depth of my laughter!!! LOL

I think they should be quarantined until AFTER November 2nd! LOL

I am undecided (not that I am allowed to vote).

Bush's domestic policies suck. Some days I think kerry will do an ok job at int'l relations and that a fresh start is needed for the world to be brought on side (it is not a matter of "building consensus" based on concessions, but on leading people through arguments). On those days I also think Bush is a retard. Other days, I look at who would likely be in Kerry's cabinet, the types of policies he is likely to try, the emphasis (or lack thereof) he will have on the war going on, and I say, for all of Bush's retardedness, he is necessary right now as is his executive.

Today I am leaning towards Bush.

minusthejihad · 10-26-2004, 12:12 PM

I'm in the David Zucker, Dennis Miller type of camp myself. Of course Bush is an idiot, its all laid out on the table. But I'm not one that believes 1 man gets to make and carry out the decisions. On the other hand, Kerry seems to have multiple personalities.

After all, "I voted for Kerry, before I voted against him!"

Roland · 10-26-2004, 12:13 PM

Originally Posted by Mediocrates

Do you think that anyone who is genuinely undecided should be allowed to walk around w/o their bike helmet?

LOLLL!!!

Originally Posted by philingraham

Amazing, or is it...?

http://www.amconmag.com/2004_11_08/cover1.html

Thanks! Very good.

Originally Posted by Canajew

Today I am leaning towards Bush.

Something wrong with gravity over there?

Emunah · 10-26-2004, 12:34 PM

Originally Posted by minusthejihad

I'm in the David Zucker, Dennis Miller type of camp myself. Of course Bush is an idiot, its all laid out on the table. But I'm not one that believes 1 man gets to make and carry out the decisions. On the other hand, Kerry seems to have multiple personalities.

After all, "I voted for Kerry, before I voted against him!"

You flip-flopper!

Dennis Miller isn't funny. He laughs at his own jokes and plays laugh tracks for the rest. I'm a Jon Stewart type...he's much better cause it's all so much hype anyway.

BTW: Some days I think Sharon is a wimp, and some days I think he is being smart. I guess I'm a flip-flopper too

golani · 10-26-2004, 12:40 PM

[QUOTE=Olivier]I'm afraid most of the people I ended up putting on my ignore list are what i'd call 'kindergarten intellect'.

The problem is not just they act like spoiled kids,

Yeah, and you can afford to talk like that because GI s fred your parents,what an irony...
And you deny Irakis the same liberty your parents received 60 years ago,it is outrageous

philingraham · 10-26-2004, 02:30 PM

Originally Posted by minusthejihad

I'm in the David Zucker, Dennis Miller type of camp myself. Of course Bush is an idiot, its all laid out on the table. But I'm not one that believes 1 man gets to make and carry out the decisions. On the other hand, Kerry seems to have multiple personalities.

After all, "I voted for Kerry, before I voted against him!"

I'll take the "multiple personality" type, any day than try to make sense out of the "manic depressive".

Your concession that Bush is an idiot lends credence to a doubt I have about the value of ALL of your previous posts...

minusthejihad · 10-26-2004, 08:34 PM

IF you would have actually read all of my other posts, you'd see that I am not a fan of Bush nor Kerry, but in this election I am voting for Bush.

However, if you are so naive to think that only Bush and Kerry are the only characters you are voting into office, so be it. I got your value right here.

Olivier · 10-27-2004, 03:10 AM

Originally Posted by golani

And you deny Irakis the same liberty your parents received 60 years ago,it is outrageous

the idea that anyone opposing the invasion is a fascist supporter of saddam is typical of Bush talk "either you're with me or you're a terrorist".

now, even someone like you must somewhat recognize, even after a long denial, that the invasion did help BL a great deal, did boost antisemistim in ways one would have though impossible , and plunged ordinary iraqis into sufferings much worse than what they suffered under saddam.

That's why it was a major step in the campaign when Kerry started saying how disastrous this invasion was ... what is amazing is the time it took him to gather the courage to say that frankly.

**Mediocrates** · 10-27-2004, 04:07 AM

Please don't appeal to your pro Saddamism in the name of defeating antisemitism. It's laughably stupid. It's beyond stupid.

minusthejihad · 10-27-2004, 10:11 AM

Lol!

TheyAre · 10-27-2004, 10:17 AM

If you actually clicked the link to the American Conservative, you'd find they wrote articles endorsing Bush, Kerry, Peroutka, Nader, Badnarik, and "Not Voting."

The AmCon magazine did not endorse Senator Kerry. It wrote articles on all the major candidates to show reasons why a conservative could vote for any of them.

now, even someone like you must somewhat recognize, even after a long denial, that the invasion did help BL a great deal, did boost antisemistim in ways one would have though impossible , and plunged ordinary iraqis into sufferings much worse than what they suffered under saddam.

The invasion was disastrous for BL. He doesn't have the manpower to fight a war in Iraq. He's losing more men every day than he can replace. Any analysis of the conflict from a military point of view can reach no other conclusion.

The existence of Israel boosts antisemitism in ways one would have thought impossible.

Just how are the sufferings of Iraqis today much worse than what they suffered under Saddam?

Iraqis seem to disagree with you.

**Mediocrates** · 10-27-2004, 10:40 AM

http://victoryfund.njdc.org/bubbie/

minusthejihad · 10-27-2004, 10:43 AM

disgusting.

philingraham · 10-27-2004, 12:23 PM

[QUOTE=TheyAre]If you actually clicked the link to the American Conservative, you'd find they wrote articles endorsing Bush, Kerry, Peroutka, Nader, Badnarik, and "Not Voting."

The AmCon magazine did not endorse Senator Kerry. It wrote articles on all the major candidates to show reasons why a conservative could vote for any of them.

You're right TheyAre. I was wrong. The American Conservative did not endorse John Kerry. My apologies...